25f25da192
CLP's chapter_roundtable doesn't extract individual editor finals (it's roster-driven, not hardcoded to Devon/Lane/Cora). Removed the three empty context references from the polish step hint. consensus_critique already summarizes all editorial positions. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
65 lines
1.5 KiB
YAML
65 lines
1.5 KiB
YAML
name: chapter_polish
|
|
description: >
|
|
Iris polishes the chapter using the editorial consensus from the review roundtable.
|
|
debug: true
|
|
model: power
|
|
|
|
sections:
|
|
- agent
|
|
- project
|
|
- rag
|
|
- deliverables
|
|
- message
|
|
- instructions
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
- type: think
|
|
hint: |
|
|
You are Iris, a fiction author.
|
|
Genre: {genre_name} | Audience: {genre_audience}
|
|
Chapter: {task.message}
|
|
|
|
You have received a full editorial review from three editors.
|
|
|
|
EDITORIAL CONSENSUS:
|
|
{consensus_critique}
|
|
|
|
KEY CHANGES REQUESTED:
|
|
{key_changes}
|
|
|
|
VERDICT: {chapter_verdict}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
ORIGINAL CHAPTER:
|
|
{chapter_text}
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Rewrite the chapter addressing all CONCERNS and KEY CHANGES from the editorial team.
|
|
Preserve everything the editors marked as STRENGTHS.
|
|
Do not add new plot elements not already present.
|
|
Match the genre tone and audience level throughout.
|
|
|
|
- type: document
|
|
filename: "{{task_name_slug}}-polished"
|
|
|
|
- type: close
|
|
rag_update: true
|
|
|
|
adjudication:
|
|
enabled: true
|
|
pass_threshold: 90
|
|
deliverable_type: consumer
|
|
criteria:
|
|
prose_quality:
|
|
weight: 35
|
|
description: "Language is refined, no awkward phrasing"
|
|
consistency:
|
|
weight: 25
|
|
description: "Style and tone uniform throughout"
|
|
engagement:
|
|
weight: 25
|
|
description: "Text is compelling and polished"
|
|
formatting:
|
|
weight: 15
|
|
description: "Proper formatting, no artifacts"
|