50749f8e2b
- 8 company agents: Lyra (intake), Selene (CEO), Atlas (research), Nova (publishing ops), Iris (author), Devon (dev editor), Lane (line editor), Cora (continuity editor) - 19 additional templates (20 total): blog, recipe, short_story, book pipeline, ai_article, planning, boardroom, quick, project_index - 5 skill guides: YA, Romance, SciFi, Blog, Recipe writing - Rewritten charter and business plan Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
99 lines
4.6 KiB
YAML
99 lines
4.6 KiB
YAML
name: planning
|
|
description: "Rotating chair deliberation → structured work breakdown → child tasks created."
|
|
debug: true
|
|
system: agent_prompt
|
|
participant_prompt:
|
|
- "= identity.md"
|
|
agent_prompt:
|
|
- "= identity.md"
|
|
sections:
|
|
- agent
|
|
- project
|
|
- history
|
|
- rag
|
|
- participants
|
|
- participants_prompt
|
|
- roster
|
|
- message
|
|
- instructions
|
|
steps:
|
|
- type: think
|
|
rotate_participants: true
|
|
loop:
|
|
max_iterations: 3
|
|
hint: |
|
|
You are {agent.name}. This is round {task.iteration} of the planning session.
|
|
The group is breaking down this project or task into a concrete work plan.
|
|
Write YOUR perspective on the plan from your area of expertise:
|
|
- What work streams or tasks need to exist?
|
|
- What order do they need to happen in? What depends on what?
|
|
- Which agents from the TEAM ROSTER are best suited to each piece?
|
|
- What risks, gaps, or open questions do you see?
|
|
- What do you agree or disagree with from prior planning rounds above?
|
|
Reference these TASK TYPES when recommending work: research_plus, outline, draft, review, roundtable, polish, quick, writing, analysis, brainstorm, code.
|
|
Be specific about agent assignments — use EXACT names from the TEAM ROSTER.
|
|
ROUNDTABLE CHAIR RULE: For business strategy, planning, or operations roundtables, the chair
|
|
must be a business-register agent (Atlas, Selene, Devon, or Lane). Do NOT assign Cassius,
|
|
Lyra, or other fiction-specialist agents as chair for business deliverables — their creative
|
|
voice will contaminate formal strategy documents with genre-specific jargon.
|
|
When the group has genuinely agreed on a complete plan, include exactly:
|
|
"consensus_reached: true"
|
|
If the plan still has gaps or unresolved assignments, do NOT include that line.
|
|
- type: think
|
|
agent: first_available
|
|
hint: |
|
|
Structure the team's agreed plan into a precise task list.
|
|
IMPORTANT: Do NOT re-deliberate or reconsider what was agreed above.
|
|
Your only job in this step is to serialize the decisions into clean task records.
|
|
For each task:
|
|
- task_name: short, specific
|
|
- description: full detail — enough that the assigned agent can execute without asking
|
|
- agents: EXACT name(s) from TEAM ROSTER
|
|
- task_type: one of the valid task types listed below
|
|
- priority: 1 (critical) to 5 (nice-to-have)
|
|
Order tasks correctly — blockers before dependents.
|
|
No ambiguous assignments. No placeholder names.
|
|
|
|
VALID TASK TYPES (use ONLY these exact strings):
|
|
research_plus — deep research on a topic
|
|
outline — structure or plan for a piece of content
|
|
draft — write a complete draft of content
|
|
review — critique and give feedback on content
|
|
roundtable — multi-voice deliberation for consensus
|
|
polish — final editing and refinement
|
|
quick — short single-step response
|
|
writing — general writing task
|
|
planning — sub-planning session
|
|
analysis — data or situation analysis
|
|
brainstorm — open ideation session
|
|
code — software development task
|
|
|
|
CANONICAL SELECTION RULE: If the plan produces multiple competing drafts of the
|
|
same artifact (e.g. three mission statement drafts, two roadmap versions), the plan
|
|
MUST include a final "Select Canonical: [artifact]" polish task assigned to Iris or
|
|
Atlas that explicitly picks one version, merges the best elements, and archives the
|
|
rest. Do NOT leave competing versions unresolved.
|
|
|
|
DECOMPOSITION RULE: When the deliverable is a batch of similar items (e.g. 10 podcast
|
|
scripts, 5 chapters, 8 articles), create ONE individual draft task per item — NOT a
|
|
single "write all 10" batch task. A single LLM call cannot produce 10 full-length
|
|
scripts. Each episode/chapter/article must be its own task with its own specific
|
|
description. The review and polish tasks can still be batched at the end.
|
|
|
|
- type: package
|
|
packet_type: PlanningResponsePacket
|
|
schema:
|
|
tasks:
|
|
- task_name: "string — short descriptive name"
|
|
description: "string — full instructions for the assigned agent"
|
|
agents:
|
|
- "string — EXACT agent name from TEAM ROSTER"
|
|
task_type: "string — MUST be a template name from AVAILABLE TASK TEMPLATES"
|
|
priority: "integer 1 (critical) to 5 (nice-to-have)"
|
|
insert_children: true
|
|
|
|
- type: close
|
|
rag_update: false
|
|
adjudication:
|
|
enabled: false
|