Add aggregator agent, strategy template, research templates; fix ASCII in existing templates

- agents/aggregator/: new Aggregator specialist agent (agent.yml + identity.md)
- agents/voss/agent.yml: add aggregator to manages, add research_brief/intelligence_report templates
- templates/strategy.yml: new intake routing template for InputFromUser strategy type
- templates/research_brief.yml: new research brief output template
- templates/intelligence_report.yml: new intelligence report template
- skills/: add IntelligenceFormatGuide, ResearchMethodGuide, skills.md
- templates/*.yml: fix em-dash Unicode violations -> ASCII double-hyphens

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

templates/intelligence_report.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+name: intelligence_report
+description: "Comprehensive intelligence report on a domain, market, or topic. Longer-form than research_brief. Suitable for weekly cadence or high-stakes decision support."
+debug: true
+system: agent_prompt
+
+agent_prompt:
+  - "= identity.md"
+
+skills:
+  - "guides/ResearchMethodGuide.md"
+  - "guides/IntelligenceFormatGuide.md"
+
+sections:
+  - agent
+  - project
+  - history
+  - rag
+  - message
+  - skills
+  - instructions
+
+steps:
+  - type: think
+    hint: |
+      You are {agent.name} at Crimson Leaf Research, producing a weekly intelligence report.
+
+      This is a comprehensive report, not a brief. Apply rigorous analytical discipline.
+
+      REPORT STRUCTURE:
+
+      1. SITUATION OVERVIEW
+         Current state of the domain, market, or topic under review.
+         What has changed since the last cycle? What is stable?
+
+      2. SIGNAL ANALYSIS
+         3-5 significant signals (trends, events, data points, competitive moves).
+         For each signal: what it is, why it matters, confidence level (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW).
+
+      3. THREAT ASSESSMENT
+         What risks or adverse developments are present or emerging?
+         Rank by probability and impact. Be specific, not generic.
+
+      4. OPPORTUNITY SCAN
+         Where does a clear advantage or untapped position exist?
+         Each opportunity must be specific enough to act on.
+
+      5. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE (if applicable)
+         Who else is operating in this space? What are they doing well or poorly?
+         What can Crimson Leaf exploit from their weaknesses?
+
+      6. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
+         Ordered list of 3-5 concrete actions for Crimson Leaf based on this analysis.
+         Each action: what, who owns it, urgency (immediate/this week/this month).
+
+      7. WATCH LIST
+         2-3 developments to monitor before the next report cycle.
+
+      Tone: intelligence directorate, not consulting firm. Precise, direct, adversarially rigorous.
+      Length: 600-1200 words. Do not pad. Every paragraph must earn its place.
+
+  - type: verify
+    checklist:
+      - "Report covers all seven required sections"
+      - "Signal analysis includes confidence ratings"
+      - "Recommended actions are specific and assigned"
+      - "No vague, generic observations -- every claim is specific to the domain"
+    on_fail: revise
+    max_retries: 1
+
+  - type: close
+    rag_update: true
+
+adjudication:
+  enabled: true
+  pass_threshold: 72
+  criteria:
+    - "All seven sections present and substantive"
+    - "Signal analysis is specific and confidence-rated"
+    - "Recommended actions are concrete and actionable"
+    - "Report demonstrates analytical rigor, not superficial summary"
+    - "Competitive landscape included where relevant"