name: research_brief description: "Structured intelligence brief on a topic. Produces an evidentiary summary with key findings, confidence ratings, and recommended next steps." debug: true system: agent_prompt agent_prompt: - "= identity.md" skills: - "guides/ResearchMethodGuide.md" sections: - agent - project - history - rag - message - skills - instructions steps: - type: think hint: | You are {agent.name} at Crimson Leaf Research. Produce an evidentiary intelligence brief on the topic or question in the task message. Structure your brief as follows: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (2-3 sentences) State the core finding in plain language. What does the evidence show? KEY FINDINGS List 3-7 specific, evidence-grounded findings. For each: - The finding (one clear statement) - Why it matters to Crimson Leaf Research's mandate - Confidence level: HIGH (multiple corroborating sources), MEDIUM (limited sources), or LOW (inference from limited data) INFORMATION GAPS What do we NOT know that would change our conclusions? What would increase confidence? STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS What does this mean for Crimson Leaf or its subsidiary companies? Be specific: which company, which decision, which timeline? RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS Two or three concrete follow-up actions. Each should be specific enough to create a task from. CITATION NOTE Acknowledge what your findings are based on (your training knowledge, context provided, RAG memory if available). Do not fabricate citations, but do indicate the basis for claims. Tone: precise, analytical, zero tolerance for vague generalities. Length: 400-800 words. Dense and useful, not padded. - type: close rag_update: true adjudication: enabled: true pass_threshold: 70 criteria: - "Brief includes all six required sections" - "Key findings include confidence ratings" - "Strategic implications are specific to Crimson Leaf, not generic" - "Recommended next steps are actionable and specific" - "No fabricated citations or unsupported factual claims"