2fe8364255
- agents/aggregator/: new Aggregator specialist agent (agent.yml + identity.md) - agents/voss/agent.yml: add aggregator to manages, add research_brief/intelligence_report templates - templates/strategy.yml: new intake routing template for InputFromUser strategy type - templates/research_brief.yml: new research brief output template - templates/intelligence_report.yml: new intelligence report template - skills/: add IntelligenceFormatGuide, ResearchMethodGuide, skills.md - templates/*.yml: fix em-dash Unicode violations -> ASCII double-hyphens Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
68 lines
2.2 KiB
YAML
68 lines
2.2 KiB
YAML
name: research_brief
|
|
description: "Structured intelligence brief on a topic. Produces an evidentiary summary with key findings, confidence ratings, and recommended next steps."
|
|
debug: true
|
|
system: agent_prompt
|
|
|
|
agent_prompt:
|
|
- "= identity.md"
|
|
|
|
skills:
|
|
- "guides/ResearchMethodGuide.md"
|
|
|
|
sections:
|
|
- agent
|
|
- project
|
|
- history
|
|
- rag
|
|
- message
|
|
- skills
|
|
- instructions
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
- type: think
|
|
hint: |
|
|
You are {agent.name} at Crimson Leaf Research. Produce an evidentiary intelligence brief
|
|
on the topic or question in the task message.
|
|
|
|
Structure your brief as follows:
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (2-3 sentences)
|
|
State the core finding in plain language. What does the evidence show?
|
|
|
|
KEY FINDINGS
|
|
List 3-7 specific, evidence-grounded findings. For each:
|
|
- The finding (one clear statement)
|
|
- Why it matters to Crimson Leaf Research's mandate
|
|
- Confidence level: HIGH (multiple corroborating sources), MEDIUM (limited sources),
|
|
or LOW (inference from limited data)
|
|
|
|
INFORMATION GAPS
|
|
What do we NOT know that would change our conclusions? What would increase confidence?
|
|
|
|
STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS
|
|
What does this mean for Crimson Leaf or its subsidiary companies?
|
|
Be specific: which company, which decision, which timeline?
|
|
|
|
RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS
|
|
Two or three concrete follow-up actions. Each should be specific enough to create a task from.
|
|
|
|
CITATION NOTE
|
|
Acknowledge what your findings are based on (your training knowledge, context provided,
|
|
RAG memory if available). Do not fabricate citations, but do indicate the basis for claims.
|
|
|
|
Tone: precise, analytical, zero tolerance for vague generalities.
|
|
Length: 400-800 words. Dense and useful, not padded.
|
|
|
|
- type: close
|
|
rag_update: true
|
|
|
|
adjudication:
|
|
enabled: true
|
|
pass_threshold: 70
|
|
criteria:
|
|
- "Brief includes all six required sections"
|
|
- "Key findings include confidence ratings"
|
|
- "Strategic implications are specific to Crimson Leaf, not generic"
|
|
- "Recommended next steps are actionable and specific"
|
|
- "No fabricated citations or unsupported factual claims"
|