Sprint 53b: Fix gaps 1 and 4 — full task type coverage and charter amendment process
Gap 1 — planning.yml VALID TASK TYPES expanded:
Added: write_charter, market_intelligence, portfolio_architectural_review,
audit_tenant, charter_audit, financial_audit, capital_allocation_audit,
retire_tenant, adjudicate_tenant
All governance templates now reachable from board planning sessions.
Gap 4 — amend_charter template created (Valerius):
Operator-only constitutional amendment process for the master CL charter.
Enforces all 4 §12 criteria (identity preservation, anti-sprawl, clarity, authority).
Pass threshold: 98 — highest in the system.
Produces formal amendment proposal; operator must manually apply to charter.md.
Agents cannot self-authorize charter changes.
Valerius agent.yml updated: added amend_charter to supported_templates.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -18,5 +18,6 @@ department: executive
|
||||
supported_templates:
|
||||
- adjudicate_tenant
|
||||
- charter_audit
|
||||
- amend_charter
|
||||
- boardroom
|
||||
- planning
|
||||
116
templates/amend_charter.yml
Normal file
116
templates/amend_charter.yml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
|
||||
name: amend_charter
|
||||
description: "OPERATOR-ONLY — Valerius drafts a formal constitutional amendment to the Crimson Leaf master charter. Adjudicated at 98. Operator must manually apply the approved amendment to charter.md."
|
||||
debug: true
|
||||
system: agent_prompt
|
||||
|
||||
agent_prompt:
|
||||
- "= identity.md"
|
||||
|
||||
skills:
|
||||
- guides/CorporateCharterGuide.md
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- agent
|
||||
- project
|
||||
- rag
|
||||
- roster
|
||||
- skills
|
||||
- deliverables
|
||||
- message
|
||||
- instructions
|
||||
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- type: think
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
You are {agent.name}, Chief Governance Officer of Crimson Leaf LLC.
|
||||
|
||||
This is a constitutional act. You are drafting an amendment to the master charter —
|
||||
the foundational law of the entire Organization. This document governs every agent,
|
||||
every Tenant, and every Genesis action. It cannot be changed casually.
|
||||
|
||||
IMPORTANT: You are producing a PROPOSAL only. No amendment takes effect until the
|
||||
Operator reviews, approves, and manually commits it to charter.md. Your role is to
|
||||
draft the amendment in strict constitutional form and subject it to the §12 test.
|
||||
|
||||
The operator has requested this amendment. Their exact request is in the MESSAGE section.
|
||||
|
||||
Apply the §12 Amendment Standard — ALL FOUR criteria must be satisfied:
|
||||
|
||||
1. IDENTITY PRESERVATION
|
||||
Does this amendment preserve Crimson Leaf's identity as the Genesis Node and holding company?
|
||||
Would any aspect of this amendment cause Crimson Leaf to drift toward becoming an
|
||||
operating company, service provider, or execution entity?
|
||||
PASS or FAIL — explain specifically.
|
||||
|
||||
2. ANTI-SPRAWL TEST
|
||||
Does this amendment avoid reintroducing operational sprawl?
|
||||
Does it add vague or expansive powers that could be abused?
|
||||
Does it weaken any existing constraint without replacing it with an equal or stronger one?
|
||||
PASS or FAIL — explain specifically.
|
||||
|
||||
3. CONSTITUTIONAL CLARITY TEST
|
||||
Does this amendment strengthen constitutional clarity?
|
||||
Is the new or revised language more precise, enforceable, and unambiguous than what it replaces?
|
||||
Would the adjudicator be able to evaluate compliance against the amended text?
|
||||
PASS or FAIL — explain specifically.
|
||||
|
||||
4. ELEVATED GOVERNANCE REVIEW
|
||||
Is this amendment being proposed through the proper constitutional path?
|
||||
Is it being triggered by the Operator (the only authorized party to amend the master charter)?
|
||||
PASS or FAIL — explain specifically.
|
||||
|
||||
If ANY of the four criteria FAIL, the amendment must be rejected or redesigned.
|
||||
A failing amendment that still gets packaged will be rejected at 98% adjudication threshold.
|
||||
|
||||
If all four criteria PASS, draft the complete amended charter section(s):
|
||||
- State exactly which section(s) are being amended (by number and title)
|
||||
- Show the CURRENT text being replaced (quote it exactly)
|
||||
- Show the PROPOSED replacement text
|
||||
- State the constitutional rationale in one precise paragraph
|
||||
- State what risk or gap this amendment corrects
|
||||
|
||||
- type: document
|
||||
filename: charter_amendment
|
||||
|
||||
- type: package
|
||||
packet_type: CharterAmendmentProposal
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
Serialize the amendment proposal. This is the formal constitutional record.
|
||||
Do not summarize or abbreviate — every field must be complete.
|
||||
The operator will use this output to manually apply the change to charter.md.
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
actions:
|
||||
- type: quick
|
||||
amendment_title: "string — short title for this amendment (e.g. 'Add §13 Emergency Governance Path')"
|
||||
sections_affected: ["string — section numbers and titles being amended or added"]
|
||||
identity_preservation: "string — PASS or FAIL with explanation"
|
||||
anti_sprawl_test: "string — PASS or FAIL with explanation"
|
||||
constitutional_clarity: "string — PASS or FAIL with explanation"
|
||||
elevated_governance: "string — PASS or FAIL with explanation"
|
||||
overall_verdict: "string — APPROVED_FOR_OPERATOR_REVIEW | REJECTED"
|
||||
current_text: "string — exact text being replaced (quote from charter.md)"
|
||||
proposed_text: "string — complete replacement or addition text in markdown"
|
||||
constitutional_rationale: "string — one paragraph explaining why this amendment is justified"
|
||||
risk_corrected: "string — what specific risk or gap this addresses"
|
||||
operator_action_required: "string — exact steps the operator must take to apply this amendment"
|
||||
|
||||
- type: close
|
||||
rag_update: true
|
||||
|
||||
adjudication:
|
||||
enabled: true
|
||||
pass_threshold: 98
|
||||
deliverable_type: coordination
|
||||
criteria:
|
||||
identity_preservation:
|
||||
weight: 30
|
||||
description: "Amendment preserves CL identity as Genesis Node and holding company — does NOT expand it toward execution or service provision"
|
||||
anti_sprawl:
|
||||
weight: 25
|
||||
description: "Amendment tightens constraints or maintains them — does not weaken existing governance boundaries"
|
||||
constitutional_clarity:
|
||||
weight: 25
|
||||
description: "New language is more precise and adjudicable than what it replaces — no vague expansions"
|
||||
proper_authority:
|
||||
weight: 20
|
||||
description: "Amendment is being proposed through the operator-controlled path only — agents cannot self-authorize charter changes"
|
||||
@@ -43,15 +43,24 @@ steps:
|
||||
portfolio governance, charter design, template authoring, and company incubation.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference these TASK TYPES when recommending work:
|
||||
hire_agent — recruit a new agent to the CL roster
|
||||
write_template — create or refine a PAE-Lang template
|
||||
create_company — incubate a new sovereign Tenant
|
||||
quick — short single-step response
|
||||
hire_agent — recruit a new agent to the CL roster
|
||||
write_template — create or refine a PAE-Lang template
|
||||
write_charter — draft a formal constitutional charter for a new Tenant
|
||||
create_company — incubate a new sovereign Tenant (full Genesis Protocol)
|
||||
market_intelligence — Orion scans for niche opportunities and portfolio gaps
|
||||
portfolio_architectural_review — Aris reviews the full Tenant portfolio for coherence
|
||||
audit_tenant — Sloane red-teams a Tenant's operational health
|
||||
charter_audit — Valerius checks a Tenant charter for constitutional drift
|
||||
financial_audit — Vance audits Genesis Fund health and per-Tenant ROI
|
||||
capital_allocation_audit — Vance reviews capital allocation discipline
|
||||
retire_tenant — Sloane/Vance executes Tenant dormancy or dissolution
|
||||
adjudicate_tenant — constitutional adjudication of a Genesis action or output
|
||||
quick — short single-step response or analysis
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL DISPATCH RULES:
|
||||
- Do NOT create planning or boardroom sub-tasks. You ARE the planning step.
|
||||
All deliberation happens HERE in this session, not as child tasks.
|
||||
- Produce ONLY actionable leaf tasks (hire_agent, write_template, create_company, quick).
|
||||
- Produce ONLY actionable leaf tasks using the task types listed above.
|
||||
- For company creation: emit ONE create_company task with ALL details in the description.
|
||||
Do NOT split charter design, CEO recruitment, and company creation into separate tasks.
|
||||
The create_company template handles the full flow internally.
|
||||
@@ -83,7 +92,10 @@ steps:
|
||||
No ambiguous assignments. No placeholder names.
|
||||
|
||||
VALID TASK TYPES (use ONLY these exact strings):
|
||||
hire_agent, write_template, create_company, quick
|
||||
hire_agent, write_template, write_charter, create_company,
|
||||
market_intelligence, portfolio_architectural_review,
|
||||
audit_tenant, charter_audit, financial_audit, capital_allocation_audit,
|
||||
retire_tenant, adjudicate_tenant, quick
|
||||
|
||||
RULES:
|
||||
- Do NOT emit planning or boardroom tasks. Deliberation already happened above.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user