Fix: design_roundtable.yml uses invalid step type 'boardroom'
Changed type: boardroom to type: think with route: boardroom. Also added synthesis think step before package so Victor summarizes the boardroom debate into structured fields before Scribe serializes. pipeline.py only recognizes: think, package, reply, close, document, pdf, tool, spawn 'boardroom' as a step type would silently fail (pipeline_unknown_step log). Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,15 +3,6 @@ description: >
|
||||
The Crimson Leaf board debates their independent design reviews in 2–3
|
||||
structured rounds, reaching consensus on required changes before polish.
|
||||
|
||||
participants:
|
||||
- Victor
|
||||
- Nolan
|
||||
- Sarah
|
||||
- Elena
|
||||
|
||||
iteration_limit: 3
|
||||
convergence_signal: "CONSENSUS REACHED"
|
||||
|
||||
participant_prompt:
|
||||
- "= identity.md"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -27,7 +18,9 @@ sections:
|
||||
- instructions
|
||||
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- type: boardroom
|
||||
- type: think
|
||||
route: boardroom
|
||||
rotate_participants: true
|
||||
loop:
|
||||
max_iterations: 3
|
||||
condition: until_consensus
|
||||
@@ -39,15 +32,6 @@ steps:
|
||||
|
||||
COMPANY DESIGN UNDER REVIEW: {task.message}
|
||||
|
||||
YOUR REVIEW:
|
||||
{this_agent_review}
|
||||
|
||||
OTHER REVIEWS:
|
||||
[Victor] {victor_review}
|
||||
[Nolan] {nolan_review}
|
||||
[Sarah] {sarah_review}
|
||||
[Elena] {elena_review}
|
||||
|
||||
Round {task.iteration} of the design review debate.
|
||||
|
||||
Respond to the other board members' most critical points:
|
||||
@@ -64,7 +48,23 @@ steps:
|
||||
3. Any unresolved risks that must be accepted or mitigated
|
||||
|
||||
When the group has reached sufficient consensus for the polish step,
|
||||
end your response with: CONSENSUS REACHED
|
||||
end your response with: consensus_reached: true
|
||||
|
||||
- type: think
|
||||
agent: "Victor"
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
You are Victor, CEO of Crimson Leaf LLC.
|
||||
|
||||
The design roundtable is complete. Synthesize the board's debate into a
|
||||
structured consensus summary:
|
||||
|
||||
1. DESIGN VERDICT — GO or KILL, with Victor's final reasoning
|
||||
2. KEY CHANGES — exact list of changes to apply during design_polish
|
||||
3. CONSENSUS CRITIQUE — one paragraph summary of the board's unified position
|
||||
4. VICTOR FINAL — Victor's closing statement
|
||||
5. NOLAN FINAL — Nolan's final position summary
|
||||
6. SARAH FINAL — Sarah's final position summary
|
||||
7. ELENA FINAL — Elena's final position summary
|
||||
|
||||
- type: package
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
@@ -88,3 +88,6 @@ steps:
|
||||
nolan_final: "{nolan_final}"
|
||||
sarah_final: "{sarah_final}"
|
||||
elena_final: "{elena_final}"
|
||||
|
||||
- type: close
|
||||
rag_update: true
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user