Write template: adjudicate_tenant by unknown (adj_score=100)

templates/adjudicate_tenant.yml

@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@ description: "Constitutional evaluation of a proposed Tenant against the 9-point
 system: agent_prompt
 agent_prompt:
   - "= identity.md"
-requires:
-  - proposed_charter
-  - seed_budget
+skills:
+  - "guides/PAETemplateGuide.md"
 sections:
   - agent
   - project
+  - history
   - rag
   - message
   - instructions
@@ -16,32 +16,30 @@ steps:
   - type: think
     model: power
     hint: |
-      Perform a rigorous audit of the proposed Tenant. 
-      Evaluate against the 9-point Tenant Creation Standard. 
-      Verify: 
-      1. Absolute market necessity.
-      2. Zero overlap with existing portfolio.
-      3. Narrow, black-box business thesis.
-      4. Sovereign, yet compliant charter.
-      5. Validated seed budget.
-      6. Absence of recursive loops or internal circularity.
+      Perform a rigorous 9-point audit of the proposed Tenant. 
+      You must evaluate: 
+      1. Market Necessity 
+      2. Portfolio Redundancy 
+      3. Logic Purity (Black-box thesis) 
+      4. Charter Sovereignty 
+      5. Budget Validity 
+      6. Recursive Loop Absence 
+      7. Deterministic Tool Redundancy 
+      8. Scalability 
+      9. Risk Profile.
       
-      Output a binary verdict: APPROVED or VETOED.
-  - type: think
-    hint: |
-      Based on the previous analysis, draft the formal Adjudication Ledger entry. 
-      Include specific citations from the Genesis Charter for any rejection.
+      The approval threshold is binary: 95% confidence or Reject. 
+      Speak with legalistic brevity. Provide a 'Verdict' and 'Findings'.
   - type: package
     packet_type: AdjudicationVerdict
     schema:
-      verdict: "string"
-      confidence_score: "integer"
-      citations: ["string"]
-      revisions_required: ["string"]
-      approved_for_capital_review: "boolean"
-    hint: "Serialize the verdict. Ensure zero discourse occurs in this step."
+      verdict: "string (APPROVED | REJECTED)"
+      confidence_score: "integer (0-100)"
+      findings: "string"
+      required_revisions: ["string"]
+    hint: "Serialize the verdict and findings from the previous step. Do not add new analysis."
   - type: document
-    filename: adjudication-verdict
+    filename: "adjudication-verdict"
   - type: close
     rag_update: true
 adjudication:
@@ -49,9 +47,9 @@ adjudication:
   pass_threshold: 95
   deliverable_type: coordination
   criteria:
-    precision:
+    constitutional_purity:
       weight: 70
-      description: "Strict adherence to the 9-point standard and Genesis Charter."
-    brevity:
+      description: "Proposed Tenant shows zero drift from the Genesis Charter."
+    analytical_precision:
       weight: 30
-      description: "Absence of filler, hyperbole, or non-legalistic language."
+      description: "Findings are data-driven and free of hyperbole."