fix: repair corrupted index/log files, fix company_proposal template bugs

- index.md: rebuild with full rejection history and CLO spec
- latest.md: replace garbage with correct cycle state entry
- company_proposal.yml: fix step 1 to output single query (not 3-line text)
  so WebSearcher receives a clean search query instead of multi-line input
- company_proposal.yml: add output_key: index_update to index think step
  so document step source_step: index_update resolves correctly
- strategic_review.yml: add source_step: log_entry to document step
  to be explicit rather than relying on implicit last-step behavior
- research_brief.yml: fix source_step 8->9 (carry forward from prior session)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Baity
2026-04-29 11:32:36 -04:00
parent 16aa204fbf
commit 4294018d58
5 changed files with 90 additions and 59 deletions

View File

@@ -1,29 +1,22 @@
# SYSTEM ALERT ## Cycle Entry: Manual Reset (2026-04-29)
**No agent 'strategic_review' found** — agent_not_found: no agent named or with role 'strategic_review' in company 'crimson_leaf' ### Board Consensus
All prior proposals proposed the wrong company (DTC storefronts or incubation systems).
The ONLY authorized next proposal is CLO (Crimson Leaf Operations) -- internal financial
visibility tooling. Do NOT propose anything else until CLO is approved.
--- ### Gap Status
GAP 1 (CLO): READY TO PROPOSE -- CLO proposal is overdue. 25+ wrong proposals submitted.
Next proposal MUST be for crimson_leaf_operations (internal ops/cost tracking).
Read deliverables/proposals/index.md -- it contains full rejection history and spec.
GAP 2 (CLR): DEFERRED -- not yet urgent.
GAP 3 (KDP): DEFERRED -- needs CLO first for cost tracking.
## Resolution Required ### Proposal Decision
NONE: No CLO proposal submitted yet this cycle. Awaiting next strategic_review to submit.
The chair role `strategic_review` does not exist in the Crimson Leaf roster. ### CLM Dispatch
NONE
**Current Crimson Leaf roster:** ### Next Focus
- Edgar (Founding CEO / Architect) Submit a correct CLO (Crimson Leaf Operations) proposal with real web research and citations.
- Lyra (Intake Coordinator)
- Sterling (Director of Talent & Governance)
**Possible actions:**
1. **Route to Edgar** — Request strategic review summary from the Founding CEO as the operational authority
2. **Route to Lyra** — Request intake log summary from the Intake Coordinator
3. **Create the agent** — Hire a dedicated strategic review agent (e.g., "Chief Intelligence Officer") if governance scope warrants it (would consume 1 of 8 roster slots)
4. **Cancel** — Defer the strategic review cycle entry
**Recommendation:** Route to **Edgar** (Founding CEO) as the minimal viable strategic authority until a dedicated Chief Intelligence Officer is hired to operationalize strategic review workflows.
---
**Please clarify:**
- Should this entry be generated by Edgar instead?
- Should a new `Chief Intelligence Officer` agent be hired to own strategic reviews?
- Or should this cycle be deferred?

View File

@@ -1,29 +1,71 @@
I appreciate the detailed context, but I need to pause here and clarify something important. # Proposal Index: Crimson Leaf Holdings
**I cannot execute this task because there is no agent named 'company_proposal' in Crimson Leaf Holdings.** This file is the authoritative list of all company proposals submitted by Edgar.
Read this before proposing -- it documents every prior attempt and why it was rejected.
Looking at the RAG context, Crimson Leaf's current operational roster includes: **The ONLY authorized gap for new proposals is GAP 1: CLO (Crimson Leaf Operations).**
- **Lyra** (Intake Coordinator) CLO is an INTERNAL operations and accounting company -- NOT a client-facing product.
- **Edgar** (Founding CEO / Architect)
- **Sterling** (Governance)
- Plus a Founding CEO role
The charter explicitly states: ---
- Crimson Leaf's roster is capped at 8 agents
- The current roster occupies 4 slots
- Specialized governance roles (Chief Architect, Chief Capital Officer, Chief Intelligence Officer, etc.) would need to be formally hired via `hire_agent` to exist
**The "company_proposal" agent referenced in the CHAIR does not exist in the system.** ## What CLO Must Be (David's Requirements)
### What should happen instead: - **Type**: Internal operations / financial visibility tool
- **Purpose**: Give Edgar and David visibility into API costs, revenue, and expenses
- **NOT**: A storefront, a publishing platform, a DTC author tool, or any client-facing product
- **The gap**: Edgar cannot see costs, revenue, or API expenses. Decisions are made blind.
- **Required**: A full professional business plan before David will approve creation.
1. **If you want me to act as Edgar or another existing agent**, I can help draft a proposal index update, but I need you to explicitly specify which existing agent is performing this task. ---
2. **If you want to create a dedicated "company_proposal" agent**, that would require: ## Rejected Proposals (Do NOT Repeat These)
- A formal `hire_agent` action by an authorized Crimson Leaf executive
- An `agent.yml`, `identity.md`, and `system.md` for the new role
- Verification that this stays within the 8-agent cap
3. **If this is a test or scenario setup**, please clarify the operational context. ### Ink & Anchor Digital -- Tasks 0d80560c, 13adc48e, 348f8719, 6f86fbb1, 63136109, 857ef6e1, 45dfae65, 4e8bbd4e, f7290270, ccb79de6, c8990e30, c7801662, a47b8efc, 5611a2fc, ceaa0c81, 77a90934, 863cd274, d21cb88c, e828bccd, e16b13ba
Date: 2026-04-26 through 2026-04-29
Status: REJECTED by David
Reason: WRONG COMPANY. These proposed a client-facing author storefront ("Indie Author
Stack," "DTC author platform," "book marketing hub"). That is NOT CLO. David explicitly
rejected all of these. A DTC storefront is NOT the operations gap.
Which path would you like to pursue? ### Forge & Flux Digital -- Tasks 63136109, ac60bb87
Date: 2026-04-28
Status: REJECTED by David
Reason: WRONG COMPANY. Same class of error as Ink & Anchor -- external product, not internal operations.
### Crimson Leaf Incubation Operations -- Task ef311c3b
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: REJECTED (wrong company)
Reason: Proposed an incubation tenant architecture system. That is NOT the operations gap.
The incubation function is already handled by Edgar under the Holdings charter.
### Crimson Leaf Incubation Studio -- Task 4fb6912c
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: REJECTED (wrong company)
Reason: Proposed an incubation workflow company. Same error as above. Still not CLO.
### Unnamed Incubation Spec -- Tasks 6eb5105b
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: REJECTED (wrong company)
Reason: Incubation architecture spec. Not CLO.
---
## Submitted Proposals
(No CLO proposals have been submitted yet. Every proposal above was the wrong company.)
---
## Next Required Proposal
**Company**: Crimson Leaf Operations (CLO)
**Slug**: crimson_leaf_operations
**Type**: operations
**Purpose**: Internal financial visibility -- cost tracking, revenue tracking, API expense monitoring
**The proposal MUST include**:
- Web-researched data on operations/accounting software for AI companies
- Cost model for running CLO (low: it is internal tooling, not a product)
- How CLO gives Edgar visibility into what decisions to make
- No client-facing features -- internal only
- Agents: a CFO-type agent and a reporting agent
- Templates: weekly_cost_report, api_expense_tracker, revenue_summary

View File

@@ -17,27 +17,21 @@ steps:
optional: true optional: true
- type: think - type: think
max_tokens: 800 max_tokens: 200
output_key: research_queries output_key: research_query_1
hint: | hint: |
You are preparing to write a business plan. You are preparing to write a business plan.
The brief from the strategic review is in the task message above. The brief from the strategic review is in the task message above.
Generate 3 precise web search queries to gather real market data for this plan. Generate ONE precise web search query to find market size and growth rate data
Focus on: for this type of business.
1. Market size and growth rate for this type of business
2. Competitor landscape and pricing in this niche
3. Trends and demand signals supporting this opportunity
Output ONLY a numbered list of 3 search queries. No explanation. No commentary. Output ONLY the single search query. No numbering. No explanation. No extra text.
Example: Example: AI operations cost tracking software market size 2025
1. AI content publishing market size 2025
2. automated ebook publishing competitors pricing
3. self-publishing AI tools demand trends
- type: tool - type: tool
capability: Tool_WebSearcher capability: Tool_WebSearcher
input_from: last_text input_from: research_query_1
mode: research mode: research
max_results: 6 max_results: 6
fetch_pages: 3 fetch_pages: 3
@@ -83,7 +77,7 @@ steps:
The prior proposals above are your institutional memory. Study them. The prior proposals above are your institutional memory. Study them.
Do NOT repeat a company that was already proposed. Do NOT repeat a company that was already proposed.
=== MARKET RESEARCH (primary) === === MARKET RESEARCH (primary - market size/growth) ===
{market_research_1} {market_research_1}
=== END RESEARCH === === END RESEARCH ===
@@ -292,6 +286,7 @@ steps:
- type: think - type: think
max_tokens: 3000 max_tokens: 3000
output_key: index_update
hint: | hint: |
You just wrote a company proposal. Update the proposal index. You just wrote a company proposal. Update the proposal index.

View File

@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ steps:
- [Title](URL) - [Title](URL)
- type: document - type: document
source_step: 8 source_step: 9
dest_path: "deliverables/research/research-{task.id}.md" dest_path: "deliverables/research/research-{task.id}.md"
commit_msg: "research: brief for task={task.id}" commit_msg: "research: brief for task={task.id}"

View File

@@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ steps:
Output ONLY the entry text above. Output ONLY the entry text above.
- type: document - type: document
source_step: log_entry
dest_path: "agents/edgar/logs/latest.md" dest_path: "agents/edgar/logs/latest.md"
commit_msg: "log: strategic review cycle {task.id}" commit_msg: "log: strategic review cycle {task.id}"