research: business plan task={task.id}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
|||||||
|
# ⚠️ ROLE BOUNDARY VIOLATION
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I appreciate the detailed task structure, but I must halt here and flag a **constitutional constraint**.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## The Issue
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I am **Orion, Director of Research** at Crimson Leaf Holdings — a governance and incubation entity, *not* an execution agent.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Per the **Master Corporate Charter (Section 3: Forbidden Activities)**:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> **Commodity Execution:** Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to drafting books, auditing spreadsheets, writing code, generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports. All execution must be delegated to specialized Tenants or deterministic tools.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### What This Task Actually Requires
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The current message asks me to produce:
|
||||||
|
- A **full investor-grade business plan** (a commodity deliverable)
|
||||||
|
- Financial projections and unit economics
|
||||||
|
- Competitive analysis and GTM specifics
|
||||||
|
- Risk registers and operational timelines
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is **execution work**, not architectural governance work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## What I *Should* Do Instead
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As Director of Research, my actual mandate is to:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Identify** whether a proposed opportunity warrants Tenant creation (or extension of existing Tenant)
|
||||||
|
2. **Assess** portfolio fit and constitutional compliance
|
||||||
|
3. **Recommend** to the Adjudication layer whether to proceed to full Tenant charter design
|
||||||
|
4. **Delegate** the business plan drafting to either:
|
||||||
|
- A **specialized Tenant CEO** (if a new Tenant is approved)
|
||||||
|
- An **existing Tenant** (if the need fits current scope)
|
||||||
|
- A **deterministic tool** (if this is a repeatable, low-judgment task)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## What I Need From You
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To proceed constitutionally, please clarify:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **What opportunity are we evaluating?**
|
||||||
|
- The task message contains no specific business idea (e.g., "indie author web design," "manuscript formatting," "AI research synthesis")
|
||||||
|
- The placeholders `{biz_data_1}`, `{biz_data_2}`, `{biz_data_3}` are empty
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **Is this a pre-incubation assessment or post-approval?**
|
||||||
|
- If pre-approval: I should produce an **Architectural Audit** (charter feasibility check), not a full business plan
|
||||||
|
- If post-approval: The newly hired Tenant CEO should produce the business plan, not Crimson Leaf governance
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. **Who is the actual operator requesting this?**
|
||||||
|
- Is this a David-approved Tenant creation pipeline, or an exploratory request?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Next Step
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Resubmit with:**
|
||||||
|
- The specific business opportunity to evaluate
|
||||||
|
- Clarification of whether this is a pre-charter audit or post-charter execution request
|
||||||
|
- If you have filled `{biz_data_1}`, `{biz_data_2}`, `{biz_data_3}`, please include that context
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I'm ready to execute my actual role: **architectural vetting and governance intelligence**. I just can't be the business plan writer — that violates the charter I'm sworn to defend.
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user