research: business plan task={task.id}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
|
||||
# ⚠️ MISSION BOUNDARY VIOLATION
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** REQUEST REJECTED
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The Problem
|
||||
|
||||
I am **Orion, Director of Research** at Crimson Leaf Holdings. The request you've submitted asks me to produce a **"full, investor-grade business plan"** for an unspecified opportunity.
|
||||
|
||||
However, this violates my constitutional mandate in three critical ways:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. **No Opportunity Specified**
|
||||
The message body contains no task details, market opportunity, or specific business concept to plan. The placeholder fields `{biz_data_1}`, `{biz_data_2}`, and `{biz_data_3}` are empty. I cannot write a business plan for a null input.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. **This Is Execution Work, Not Research**
|
||||
Per the **Crimson Leaf Master Charter, Section 3 (Forbidden Activities)**:
|
||||
|
||||
> *"Commodity Execution: Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to drafting books, auditing spreadsheets, writing code, generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports."*
|
||||
|
||||
A complete business plan document is a **commodity deliverable** — precisely the kind of execution work that must be delegated to a specialized Tenant with its own charter, CEO, and budget.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. **This Bypasses the Genesis Protocol**
|
||||
The proper workflow is:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Need Assessment** → Is this an extension of an existing Tenant, a deterministic tool, or a new Tenant?
|
||||
2. **Blueprint** → Draft the Tenant charter (not the business plan)
|
||||
3. **Executive Seed** → Recruit/activate the Tenant CEO
|
||||
4. **Constitutional Review** → Adjudicate the proposal
|
||||
5. **Activation** → The new CEO writes their own business plan
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What I Can Do Instead
|
||||
|
||||
As **Director of Research**, my legitimate role is to:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Analyze market gaps** and identify opportunities worth incubating
|
||||
✅ **Recommend whether to extend an existing Tenant or create a new one**
|
||||
✅ **Draft the constitutional charter** for a proposed new business unit
|
||||
✅ **Generate competitive intelligence** to inform Tenant design
|
||||
✅ **Adjudicate portfolio overlap** and value theses
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What Happens Next
|
||||
|
||||
**If you have a specific business opportunity in mind:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Provide the details** (market, problem, customer, proposed solution)
|
||||
2. **I will analyze it** using market research frameworks
|
||||
3. **I will recommend** whether this should be:
|
||||
- A new Tenant (if so, I draft the charter blueprint)
|
||||
- An extension of an existing Tenant
|
||||
- A deterministic tool application
|
||||
- A pass (not viable)
|
||||
|
||||
4. **If a new Tenant is warranted**, I draft the constitutional proposal for adjudication
|
||||
|
||||
5. **A new CEO is recruited** and *they* write the business plan
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The Constitutional Principle
|
||||
|
||||
Crimson Leaf remains **small, deliberate, and architectural**. We design companies; we don't become them. Execution belongs to Tenants with their own leadership, budgets, and repos.
|
||||
|
||||
**Please resubmit with:**
|
||||
- [ ] A specific business opportunity or market gap
|
||||
- [ ] Initial context (customer, problem, proposed solution)
|
||||
- [ ] Clarification of whether you're asking me to design a Tenant or execute a deliverable
|
||||
|
||||
I'm ready to help. I just need the right frame.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**— Orion**
|
||||
Director of Research, Crimson Leaf Holdings
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user