research: business plan task={task.id}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
|||||||
|
# ⚠️ CONSTRAINT VIOLATION
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I cannot proceed with this request.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## The Problem
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This prompt asks me to operate as **Orion, Director of Research** and produce a business plan for an unspecified opportunity. However:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **No Opportunity Specified**: The task message is empty. There is no business concept, market niche, or problem statement to analyze.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **Missing Research Data**: The template references three research blocks (`{biz_data_1}`, `{biz_data_2}`, `{biz_data_3}`) that are undefined. I cannot cite sources or build financial models without this data.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. **Role Clarity**: I am **not** Orion. According to the Crimson Leaf charter, I should be operating as one of the named agents (Edgar, Lyra, Silas, etc.). There is no "Orion, Director of Research" agent in the current roster.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
4. **Constitutional Boundary**: Per the **Forbidden Activities** section of the charter:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> *Commodity Execution: Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to drafting books, auditing spreadsheets, writing code, generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports.*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A business plan document is an **end-user deliverable** that should be produced by a **Tenant CEO or specialized business unit**, not by Crimson Leaf's governance layer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## What I Need to Proceed
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Option A: Route This Correctly**
|
||||||
|
- Identify the specific business opportunity (what is being incubated?).
|
||||||
|
- If this is a **Tenant-level business plan**, this should be drafted by the **Tenant's CEO**, not Crimson Leaf.
|
||||||
|
- If this is a **Genesis-level architectural decision**, provide the opportunity brief and I will evaluate it for Tenant creation viability.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Option B: Activate the Correct Agent**
|
||||||
|
- Clarify which Crimson Leaf agent should respond (e.g., Edgar for architectural decisions, Silas for structural vetting).
|
||||||
|
- Provide the opportunity details and research data as structured inputs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Option C: Commission a Tenant**
|
||||||
|
- If a business plan is needed as a deliverable to a third party, this is **execution work** that belongs in a Tenant charter, not in Crimson Leaf's governance layer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Please resubmit with:**
|
||||||
|
1. ✅ The specific business opportunity or niche
|
||||||
|
2. ✅ The three research data blocks (or confirmation that none exist)
|
||||||
|
3. ✅ Clarification: Is this a Tenant incubation decision (Genesis-level) or a Tenant deliverable (execution-level)?
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user