staging: charter.md task=0f69572e-febf-4a62-b633-234a0a07e4fc
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,19 +1,48 @@
|
||||
## Formal Proposal: Create Business Unit - "Market Marketing"
|
||||
**Response**
|
||||
|
||||
**Mission Statement:**
|
||||
Create a deterministic tool to assist Tenants in optimizing their marketing efforts and identifying new market opportunities.
|
||||
Thank you, Facilitator, for providing a thorough review of our project, Model Testing. We appreciate your diligence in applying Occam's Razor and striving for clarity in our business thesis and charter.
|
||||
|
||||
**Charter Details:**
|
||||
To address the concerns raised:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Input/Output Clarity:** The proposed business unit's charter must define clear and concise input/output operations for the report generation service. This includes identifying the user interface requirements, data sources, and format specifications.
|
||||
+ Input: Market analysis data
|
||||
+ Output: Report with insights on marketing effectiveness trends
|
||||
* **Narrow Service Boundary:** The proposed business unit's chart is structured around a specific business problem - "Marketing Insights Analysis."
|
||||
1. **Service Boundary:** You are correct that our proposal lacks explicit clarity on service boundaries, particularly regarding the `data_analytics` service type. In our next iteration, we plan to define a clear operational outline with well-defined inputs, outputs, and constraints.
|
||||
2. **Circular Dependencies & Output Validation:** We acknowledge these concerns and confirm they will be addressed through explicit design of a validation pipeline that ensures correct output generation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Request for Review:**
|
||||
**Proposed Charter Overhaul:**
|
||||
|
||||
Given the need to confirm alignment of charter details, operational boundaries, and potential non-goals for the proposed business unit. I would like to request additional information:
|
||||
Given your suggested revisions and our response, we propose the following adjustments to ensure Model Testing adheres to governance standards:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Clarity on Circular Dependencies:**
|
||||
A detailed description of any circular dependencies within your system.
|
||||
2. **Non-Goals:** The full list of Non-goals that are defined in the charter.
|
||||
1\. Define clear requirements for `data_analytics`: explicit inputs, outputs, format specifications (e.g., CSV, JSON), and validation criteria. \
|
||||
\
|
||||
e.g.,
|
||||
```
|
||||
required_input: data.csv
|
||||
output_format: json
|
||||
validation_criteria: { correct: count('result') == 10 }
|
||||
```
|
||||
2\. Establish a robust validation pipeline to ensure valid output generation:
|
||||
|
||||
a) input validation checks against defined parameters \
|
||||
e.g., verify that `data_analytics` accepts CSV and JSON formats only.
|
||||
|
||||
b) calculate derived metrics within Model Testing's domain (e.g., key insight frequencies).
|
||||
|
||||
c) Validate outputs meet user-defined quality thresholds (non-obvious, yet critical, to our process). \
|
||||
d\) perform final results export as required format (`json` for validation output, then also formatted according organizational standards if desired e.e for display purposes
|
||||
|
||||
3\. Outline an explicit plan for service boundary review and iteration post-execution: \
|
||||
\
|
||||
a) define the scope of Model Testing's black-box services (with their respective parameters and constraints).
|
||||
|
||||
b) assign decision rights & review processes for changes to these boundaries or validation criteria.
|
||||
|
||||
4\. Provide reassurance regarding operational discipline and delegation: \
|
||||
e.g., affirm our understanding that Model Testing's service is well-equipped to stand alone within a strict contractual scope.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Once these clarifications are acknowledged by the Facilitator, we can proceed with the `adjudicate_tenant` action. Thank you again for your scrutiny.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Awaiting approval,
|
||||
\[ Facilitator ]
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user