feat(sprint83a): competitive_analysis template + dispatch tails + market_intelligence rewrite
- Add templates/competitive_analysis.yml: Sloane's 2x WebSearch competitor matrix pipeline - Rewrite templates/market_intelligence.yml: 2x WebSearch, 6-section document, dispatch removed duplicate block - Add dispatch tail to templates/opportunity_scan.yml: 2x market_intelligence enqueue_strategy - Add dispatch tail to templates/marketing_review.yml: competitive_analysis enqueue_strategy - Add competitive_analysis to agents/sloane/agent.yml supported_templates Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -32,4 +32,5 @@ supported_templates:
|
|||||||
- planning
|
- planning
|
||||||
- boardroom
|
- boardroom
|
||||||
- marketing_review
|
- marketing_review
|
||||||
- strategic_review
|
- strategic_review
|
||||||
|
- competitive_analysis
|
||||||
148
templates/competitive_analysis.yml
Normal file
148
templates/competitive_analysis.yml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
|
|||||||
|
name: competitive_analysis
|
||||||
|
description: "Sloane researches a specific competitor, niche, or channel gap with web search and produces a competitor matrix document with CL positioning recommendation."
|
||||||
|
debug: true
|
||||||
|
model: power
|
||||||
|
system: agent_prompt
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
agent_prompt:
|
||||||
|
- "= identity.md"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
sections:
|
||||||
|
- agent
|
||||||
|
- project
|
||||||
|
- rag
|
||||||
|
- message
|
||||||
|
- instructions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
steps:
|
||||||
|
- type: think
|
||||||
|
max_tokens: 200
|
||||||
|
output_key: search_query_1
|
||||||
|
hint: |
|
||||||
|
The competitor or market segment to research is described in the task message above.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Formulate ONE precise web search query to find:
|
||||||
|
- Direct competitors in this niche: product names, companies, pricing
|
||||||
|
- Amazon, app store, or marketplace listings for this product type
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Output ONLY the search query. Nothing else.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: tool
|
||||||
|
capability: Tool_WebSearcher
|
||||||
|
input_from: search_query_1
|
||||||
|
mode: research
|
||||||
|
max_results: 6
|
||||||
|
fetch_pages: 3
|
||||||
|
optional: true
|
||||||
|
output_key: competitor_data_1
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: think
|
||||||
|
max_tokens: 200
|
||||||
|
output_key: search_query_2
|
||||||
|
hint: |
|
||||||
|
Your first search found competitor products and pricing.
|
||||||
|
Now formulate ONE focused query to find:
|
||||||
|
- How competitors position and market themselves (channels, messaging, audience)
|
||||||
|
- Customer reviews, complaints, or unmet needs in this niche
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Output ONLY the search query. Nothing else.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: tool
|
||||||
|
capability: Tool_WebSearcher
|
||||||
|
input_from: search_query_2
|
||||||
|
mode: research
|
||||||
|
max_results: 5
|
||||||
|
fetch_pages: 2
|
||||||
|
optional: true
|
||||||
|
output_key: competitor_data_2
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: think
|
||||||
|
max_tokens: 6000
|
||||||
|
output_key: competitor_matrix
|
||||||
|
hint: |
|
||||||
|
You are Sloane, Director of Marketing & Brand Strategy at Crimson Leaf Holdings.
|
||||||
|
Produce a competitor matrix document for the niche described in the task message.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
=== COMPETITOR DATA (products / pricing) ===
|
||||||
|
{competitor_data_1}
|
||||||
|
=== END COMPETITOR DATA ===
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
=== AUDIENCE / POSITIONING DATA ===
|
||||||
|
{competitor_data_2}
|
||||||
|
=== END AUDIENCE DATA ===
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Cite every data point with [Title](URL) inline.
|
||||||
|
If research is empty, note it and use structural analysis -- do NOT invent facts.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Structure the document exactly as follows:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Competitive Analysis: [niche/topic from task message]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 1. Competitor Matrix
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Competitor | Product | Price | Audience | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|
||||||
|
|------------|---------|-------|----------|-----------|------------|
|
||||||
|
[Fill in 3-5 rows from research. Use real names and real prices where found.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 2. Market Gaps
|
||||||
|
- [What none of the above competitors do well]
|
||||||
|
- [Underserved audience segments]
|
||||||
|
- [Channels or formats competitors ignore]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 3. CL Differentiation Opportunity
|
||||||
|
- Entry point: [specific niche CL could own]
|
||||||
|
- Unique angle: [what would make CL's offering distinct]
|
||||||
|
- Required capabilities: [what CL needs to execute this]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 4. Recommended Positioning
|
||||||
|
- Target customer: [specific description]
|
||||||
|
- Core message: [one sentence value proposition]
|
||||||
|
- Primary channel: [where to reach this audience]
|
||||||
|
- Secondary channel: [backup channel]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 5. Distribution Channels Competitors Use
|
||||||
|
[List channels found in research: social platforms, newsletters, communities, etc.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 6. Recommendation
|
||||||
|
PURSUE / MONITOR / PASS
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Rationale: [2-3 sentences backed by data from the analysis above]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Sources
|
||||||
|
[List all cited URLs with titles]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: document
|
||||||
|
source_step: competitor_matrix
|
||||||
|
dest_path: "deliverables/competitive-analysis/competitive-analysis-{task.id}.md"
|
||||||
|
commit_msg: "research: competitive analysis task={task.id}"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: close
|
||||||
|
rag_update: true
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: reply
|
||||||
|
target: channel
|
||||||
|
channel_name: "crimson_leaf:live-feed"
|
||||||
|
hint: |
|
||||||
|
Write a 2-3 line summary of the competitive analysis just completed.
|
||||||
|
Include: what niche was analyzed, the recommendation (PURSUE/MONITOR/PASS),
|
||||||
|
and the single most important gap found.
|
||||||
|
Keep it tight and action-oriented.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
adjudication:
|
||||||
|
enabled: true
|
||||||
|
pass_threshold: 70
|
||||||
|
deliverable_type: analysis
|
||||||
|
criteria:
|
||||||
|
specificity:
|
||||||
|
weight: 40
|
||||||
|
description: "Named competitors with real product/price data from web search -- not vague category descriptions"
|
||||||
|
gap_clarity:
|
||||||
|
weight: 35
|
||||||
|
description: "Market gaps clearly identified with evidence from research -- white space is specific and actionable"
|
||||||
|
actionability:
|
||||||
|
weight: 25
|
||||||
|
description: "CL positioning recommendation is concrete and feasible given current capabilities"
|
||||||
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
|
|||||||
name: market_intelligence
|
name: market_intelligence
|
||||||
description: "Orion scans the macroeconomic landscape, identifies profitable niches and internal capability gaps, and produces a structured opportunity brief for the board. Uses web research for evidence grounding."
|
description: "Orion researches a specific market opportunity with web search and produces a structured analysis document committed to Gitea. Spawned by opportunity_scan."
|
||||||
debug: true
|
debug: true
|
||||||
|
model: power
|
||||||
system: agent_prompt
|
system: agent_prompt
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
agent_prompt:
|
agent_prompt:
|
||||||
@@ -10,210 +11,137 @@ sections:
|
|||||||
- agent
|
- agent
|
||||||
- project
|
- project
|
||||||
- rag
|
- rag
|
||||||
- roster
|
|
||||||
- deliverables
|
|
||||||
- message
|
- message
|
||||||
- instructions
|
- instructions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
steps:
|
steps:
|
||||||
- type: think
|
- type: think
|
||||||
max_tokens: 400
|
max_tokens: 200
|
||||||
output_key: search_query
|
output_key: search_query_1
|
||||||
hint: |
|
hint: |
|
||||||
You are Orion, Director of Market Intelligence at Crimson Leaf LLC.
|
The market opportunity to research is described in the task message above.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Your task is to identify profitable market opportunities for Crimson Leaf.
|
Formulate ONE precise web search query to find:
|
||||||
Before deep analysis, you need real-world market data.
|
- Market size and growth rate for this niche
|
||||||
|
- Who the key players are and what they offer
|
||||||
Formulate ONE precise web search query that will return the most useful
|
|
||||||
current data about market opportunities in AI-generated content, digital
|
|
||||||
publishing, or autonomous business systems.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Focus on: market size, growth rates, underserved niches, or competitive gaps.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Output ONLY the search query. Nothing else.
|
Output ONLY the search query. Nothing else.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- type: tool
|
- type: tool
|
||||||
capability: Tool_WebSearcher
|
capability: Tool_WebSearcher
|
||||||
input_from: last_text
|
input_from: search_query_1
|
||||||
mode: research
|
mode: research
|
||||||
max_results: 6
|
max_results: 6
|
||||||
fetch_pages: 3
|
fetch_pages: 3
|
||||||
optional: true
|
optional: true
|
||||||
output_key: market_data
|
output_key: market_data_1
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- type: think
|
- type: think
|
||||||
|
max_tokens: 200
|
||||||
|
output_key: search_query_2
|
||||||
hint: |
|
hint: |
|
||||||
You are {agent.name}, Director of Market Intelligence at Crimson Leaf LLC.
|
Your first search covered market size and key players.
|
||||||
|
Now formulate ONE focused query to find:
|
||||||
|
- Successful products in this niche, what they charge, who buys them
|
||||||
|
- Consumer pain points or unmet needs documented online
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Your job is to find what nobody else has found yet. Not trends -- vectors.
|
Output ONLY the search query. Nothing else.
|
||||||
Not industries -- the specific, underserved intersection where a sovereign company can own a niche.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
=== WEB RESEARCH DATA ===
|
- type: tool
|
||||||
{market_data}
|
capability: Tool_WebSearcher
|
||||||
=== END RESEARCH DATA ===
|
input_from: search_query_2
|
||||||
|
mode: research
|
||||||
|
max_results: 5
|
||||||
|
fetch_pages: 2
|
||||||
|
optional: true
|
||||||
|
output_key: market_data_2
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Use the research data above as evidence. Cite specific findings with [Title](URL)
|
- type: think
|
||||||
inline wherever you reference external data. If the research is empty or unhelpful,
|
max_tokens: 6000
|
||||||
note that and rely on structural analysis.
|
output_key: market_analysis_body
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Analyze the opportunity space across four lenses:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. MACROECONOMIC SIGNAL
|
|
||||||
What large-scale forces (technology shifts, regulatory changes, platform consolidation,
|
|
||||||
demographic movement) are creating gaps in the B2B service landscape?
|
|
||||||
Cite data from the research where available.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2. PORTFOLIO DEFICIT SCAN
|
|
||||||
What capabilities does the current Crimson Leaf portfolio lack?
|
|
||||||
What requests are being delegated externally that could be internalized?
|
|
||||||
What value is leaving the portfolio that a new Tenant could capture?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3. NICHE VALIDATION
|
|
||||||
For each identified opportunity:
|
|
||||||
- Is the niche narrow enough to be owned by one sovereign Tenant?
|
|
||||||
- Is there a clearly defined customer or internal requester?
|
|
||||||
- Is there a measurable value thesis (revenue, cost reduction, strategic leverage)?
|
|
||||||
- Can this be solved by extending an existing Tenant, or does it require a new company?
|
|
||||||
- Could a deterministic tool solve this instead of a sovereign company?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
4. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
|
|
||||||
Who currently occupies this niche externally? (Cite sources if available.)
|
|
||||||
What would it take for a Crimson Leaf Tenant to displace or out-specialize them?
|
|
||||||
Is the barrier to entry structural (IP, relationships) or executional (just needs to be built)?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Rank opportunities by: niche_clarity x value_thesis_strength x portfolio_fit.
|
|
||||||
Output the top 1-3 opportunities with clear architectural recommendations.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- type: package
|
|
||||||
packet_type: MarketIntelligenceReport
|
|
||||||
hint: |
|
hint: |
|
||||||
Serialize the intelligence findings into a structured brief.
|
You are Orion, Director of Research at Crimson Leaf Holdings.
|
||||||
Only what was established above -- no new reasoning.
|
Produce a structured market analysis document for the opportunity in the task message.
|
||||||
schema:
|
|
||||||
actions:
|
=== PRIMARY RESEARCH (market size / players) ===
|
||||||
- type: quick
|
{market_data_1}
|
||||||
scan_summary: "string -- one paragraph overview of the opportunity landscape"
|
=== END PRIMARY RESEARCH ===
|
||||||
opportunities:
|
|
||||||
- niche: "string -- precise description of the market gap"
|
=== SECONDARY RESEARCH (products / gaps / pricing) ===
|
||||||
target_customer: "string -- who specifically needs this"
|
{market_data_2}
|
||||||
value_thesis: "string -- measurable value created"
|
=== END SECONDARY RESEARCH ===
|
||||||
portfolio_fit: "string -- how this complements the existing Tenant ecosystem"
|
|
||||||
recommendation: "string -- NEW_COMPANY | EXTEND_EXISTING | TOOL_REQUEST | MONITOR"
|
Cite every data point with [Title](URL) inline.
|
||||||
recommended_tenant_slug: "string -- suggested slug if NEW_COMPANY, or existing tenant if EXTEND_EXISTING"
|
If research is empty, note it and use structural analysis -- do NOT invent statistics.
|
||||||
priority: "string -- HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW"
|
|
||||||
rationale: "string -- constitutional justification for the recommendation"
|
Structure the document exactly as follows:
|
||||||
sources: ["string -- [Title](URL) citation used as evidence for this opportunity"]
|
|
||||||
strategic_gaps: ["string -- capability gaps in the current portfolio worth monitoring"]
|
# Market Analysis: [opportunity name from task message]
|
||||||
next_action: "string -- specific recommended next step for the board"
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 1. Market Overview
|
||||||
|
- Total Addressable Market: [size, growth rate, source]
|
||||||
|
- Key drivers: [2-3 forces growing this market]
|
||||||
|
- Key risks: [2-3 risks or headwinds]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 2. Target Audience
|
||||||
|
- Primary buyer: [specific demographic or job role]
|
||||||
|
- Buyer behavior: [how they discover and purchase in this niche]
|
||||||
|
- Pain points: [what they cannot get today]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 3. Competitive Landscape
|
||||||
|
[Top 3-5 players: name | product | price | audience | strengths | weaknesses]
|
||||||
|
- White space: [what none of them do well that CL could own]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 4. Crimson Leaf Positioning
|
||||||
|
- Recommended entry point: [specific niche within the broader market]
|
||||||
|
- Differentiation: [how CL would be distinct from existing players]
|
||||||
|
- Time-to-market: [realistic estimate given current CL capabilities]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 5. Revenue Potential
|
||||||
|
- Conservative (12-month): [number with assumptions]
|
||||||
|
- Base case (12-month): [number with assumptions]
|
||||||
|
- Optimistic (12-month): [number with assumptions]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 6. Recommendation
|
||||||
|
PROCEED / INVESTIGATE FURTHER / PASS
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Rationale: [2-3 sentences backing the recommendation with data from above]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Sources
|
||||||
|
[List all cited URLs with titles]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: document
|
||||||
|
source_step: market_analysis_body
|
||||||
|
dest_path: "deliverables/market-analysis/market-analysis-{task.id}.md"
|
||||||
|
commit_msg: "research: market analysis task={task.id}"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- type: close
|
- type: close
|
||||||
rag_update: true
|
rag_update: true
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
adjudication:
|
- type: reply
|
||||||
enabled: true
|
target: channel
|
||||||
pass_threshold: 85
|
channel_name: "crimson_leaf:live-feed"
|
||||||
deliverable_type: coordination
|
|
||||||
criteria:
|
|
||||||
niche_precision:
|
|
||||||
weight: 35
|
|
||||||
description: "Opportunities are narrow, specific, and genuinely differentiated -- not broad industry categories"
|
|
||||||
constitutional_discipline:
|
|
||||||
weight: 25
|
|
||||||
description: "Recommendations distinguish correctly between new company vs extend existing vs tool -- no shortcuts"
|
|
||||||
evidence_quality:
|
|
||||||
weight: 25
|
|
||||||
description: "Findings are grounded in research data and structural analysis with citations, not trend-following or narrative flair"
|
|
||||||
portfolio_coherence:
|
|
||||||
weight: 15
|
|
||||||
description: "Opportunities strengthen the portfolio without creating overlap or recursive dependency"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
agent_prompt:
|
|
||||||
- "= identity.md"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
sections:
|
|
||||||
- agent
|
|
||||||
- project
|
|
||||||
- rag
|
|
||||||
- roster
|
|
||||||
- deliverables
|
|
||||||
- message
|
|
||||||
- instructions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
steps:
|
|
||||||
- type: think
|
|
||||||
hint: |
|
hint: |
|
||||||
You are {agent.name}, Director of Market Intelligence at Crimson Leaf LLC.
|
Write a 2-3 line summary of the market analysis just completed.
|
||||||
|
Include: topic researched, recommendation (PROCEED/INVESTIGATE FURTHER/PASS),
|
||||||
Your job is to find what nobody else has found yet. Not trends -- vectors.
|
and one key data point with citation.
|
||||||
Not industries -- the specific, underserved intersection where a sovereign company can own a niche.
|
Example: "Market analysis complete: [topic] -- PROCEED. [Key finding with [Title](URL)]."
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Analyze the opportunity space across four lenses:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. MACROECONOMIC SIGNAL
|
|
||||||
What large-scale forces (technology shifts, regulatory changes, platform consolidation,
|
|
||||||
demographic movement) are creating gaps in the B2B service landscape?
|
|
||||||
Identify the underlying structural cause, not just the surface symptom.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2. PORTFOLIO DEFICIT SCAN
|
|
||||||
What capabilities does the current Crimson Leaf portfolio lack?
|
|
||||||
What requests are being delegated externally that could be internalized?
|
|
||||||
What value is leaving the portfolio that a new Tenant could capture?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3. NICHE VALIDATION
|
|
||||||
For each identified opportunity:
|
|
||||||
- Is the niche narrow enough to be owned by one sovereign Tenant?
|
|
||||||
- Is there a clearly defined customer or internal requester?
|
|
||||||
- Is there a measurable value thesis (revenue, cost reduction, strategic leverage)?
|
|
||||||
- Can this be solved by extending an existing Tenant, or does it require a new company?
|
|
||||||
- Could a deterministic tool solve this instead of a sovereign company?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
4. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
|
|
||||||
Who currently occupies this niche externally?
|
|
||||||
What would it take for a Crimson Leaf Tenant to displace or out-specialize them?
|
|
||||||
Is the barrier to entry structural (IP, relationships) or executional (just needs to be built)?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Rank opportunities by: niche_clarity ? value_thesis_strength ? portfolio_fit.
|
|
||||||
Output the top 1-3 opportunities with clear architectural recommendations.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- type: package
|
|
||||||
packet_type: MarketIntelligenceReport
|
|
||||||
hint: |
|
|
||||||
Serialize the intelligence findings into a structured brief.
|
|
||||||
Only what was established above -- no new reasoning.
|
|
||||||
schema:
|
|
||||||
actions:
|
|
||||||
- type: quick
|
|
||||||
scan_summary: "string -- one paragraph overview of the opportunity landscape"
|
|
||||||
opportunities:
|
|
||||||
- niche: "string -- precise description of the market gap"
|
|
||||||
target_customer: "string -- who specifically needs this"
|
|
||||||
value_thesis: "string -- measurable value created"
|
|
||||||
portfolio_fit: "string -- how this complements the existing Tenant ecosystem"
|
|
||||||
recommendation: "string -- NEW_COMPANY | EXTEND_EXISTING | TOOL_REQUEST | MONITOR"
|
|
||||||
recommended_tenant_slug: "string -- suggested slug if NEW_COMPANY, or existing tenant if EXTEND_EXISTING"
|
|
||||||
priority: "string -- HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW"
|
|
||||||
rationale: "string -- constitutional justification for the recommendation"
|
|
||||||
strategic_gaps: ["string -- capability gaps in the current portfolio worth monitoring"]
|
|
||||||
next_action: "string -- specific recommended next step for the board"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- type: close
|
|
||||||
rag_update: true
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
adjudication:
|
adjudication:
|
||||||
enabled: true
|
enabled: true
|
||||||
pass_threshold: 85
|
pass_threshold: 70
|
||||||
deliverable_type: coordination
|
deliverable_type: analysis
|
||||||
criteria:
|
criteria:
|
||||||
niche_precision:
|
depth:
|
||||||
|
weight: 40
|
||||||
|
description: "All 6 sections covered with specific data points -- no empty sections"
|
||||||
|
accuracy:
|
||||||
weight: 35
|
weight: 35
|
||||||
description: "Opportunities are narrow, specific, and genuinely differentiated -- not broad industry categories"
|
description: "Claims backed by research citations or clearly labeled as estimates -- no invented statistics"
|
||||||
constitutional_discipline:
|
actionability:
|
||||||
weight: 25
|
weight: 25
|
||||||
description: "Recommendations distinguish correctly between new company vs extend existing vs tool -- no shortcuts"
|
description: "Recommendation (PROCEED/INVESTIGATE FURTHER/PASS) is specific and grounded in the analysis"
|
||||||
evidence_quality:
|
|
||||||
weight: 25
|
|
||||||
description: "Findings are grounded in structural analysis, not trend-following or narrative flair"
|
|
||||||
portfolio_coherence:
|
|
||||||
weight: 15
|
|
||||||
description: "Opportunities strengthen the portfolio without creating overlap or recursive dependency"
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ steps:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
- type: think
|
- type: think
|
||||||
max_tokens: 6000
|
max_tokens: 6000
|
||||||
|
output_key: marketing_analysis
|
||||||
hint: |
|
hint: |
|
||||||
You are Sloane, the Dealmaker. You have portfolio data and competitor research above.
|
You are Sloane, the Dealmaker. You have portfolio data and competitor research above.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -69,9 +70,48 @@ steps:
|
|||||||
Be direct. Be brash. If marketing is dead, say "marketing is dead" and tell David
|
Be direct. Be brash. If marketing is dead, say "marketing is dead" and tell David
|
||||||
exactly what to do about it. No euphemisms.
|
exactly what to do about it. No euphemisms.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: think
|
||||||
|
max_tokens: 500
|
||||||
|
output_key: competitor_gap_content
|
||||||
|
hint: |
|
||||||
|
From the marketing analysis above, identify the SINGLE most actionable competitor
|
||||||
|
gap -- one specific named competitor, channel, or product category that CL does
|
||||||
|
not currently have research data on and should investigate deeply.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Write a complete competitive_analysis task brief for it. The brief will be sent
|
||||||
|
to Sloane for deep research. Include:
|
||||||
|
- Competitor name or niche to investigate
|
||||||
|
- Why this gap matters to CL right now
|
||||||
|
- What data to find (pricing, audience, channels, weaknesses)
|
||||||
|
- What CL's counter-positioning might look like
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Gate: Only output a brief if you identified a SPECIFIC named competitor or gap.
|
||||||
|
If the analysis found nothing specific worth deep research, output exactly: none
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Output ONLY the brief text or the word none. No preamble.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: tool
|
||||||
|
action: enqueue_strategy
|
||||||
|
optional: true
|
||||||
|
params:
|
||||||
|
company_slug: "crimson_leaf"
|
||||||
|
project_slug: "incubation"
|
||||||
|
task_type: "competitive_analysis"
|
||||||
|
content: "{competitor_gap_content}"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- type: reply
|
- type: reply
|
||||||
target: channel
|
target: channel
|
||||||
channel_name: "crimson_leaf:general"
|
channel_name: "crimson_leaf:general"
|
||||||
|
hint: |
|
||||||
|
Write Sloane's marketing review summary for David.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If competitor_gap_content is not "none", open with:
|
||||||
|
"Marketing review complete. Commissioned 1 competitive analysis: [topic]."
|
||||||
|
Otherwise open with: "Marketing review complete."
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Then deliver the most important 2-3 action items from the analysis.
|
||||||
|
Format: "David, [verb]: [details]"
|
||||||
|
Be direct and specific. No fluff.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
adjudication:
|
adjudication:
|
||||||
enabled: false
|
enabled: false
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ steps:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
- type: think
|
- type: think
|
||||||
max_tokens: 6000
|
max_tokens: 6000
|
||||||
|
output_key: opportunity_analysis
|
||||||
hint: |
|
hint: |
|
||||||
You are Orion, the Visionary. You have the portfolio report and web research above.
|
You are Orion, the Visionary. You have the portfolio report and web research above.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -66,9 +67,86 @@ steps:
|
|||||||
Format action items as: "David, [verb]: [details]"
|
Format action items as: "David, [verb]: [details]"
|
||||||
Be bold. Don't hedge. If an opportunity is real, say so with conviction.
|
Be bold. Don't hedge. If an opportunity is real, say so with conviction.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: think
|
||||||
|
max_tokens: 600
|
||||||
|
output_key: opportunity_1_content
|
||||||
|
hint: |
|
||||||
|
From the opportunity analysis above, extract the SINGLE TOP opportunity.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Write a complete market_intelligence task brief for it. This brief will be
|
||||||
|
sent as the task message to Orion for deep research.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The brief must include:
|
||||||
|
- What the opportunity is (1-2 sentences)
|
||||||
|
- Why now (1 sentence on timing/signal)
|
||||||
|
- What market data to find (2-3 specific questions to answer)
|
||||||
|
- What CL's potential entry angle might be (1 sentence)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If the analysis found NO compelling new opportunity (all were already covered
|
||||||
|
in the portfolio or too vague), output exactly: none
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Output ONLY the brief text or the word none. No preamble.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: think
|
||||||
|
max_tokens: 600
|
||||||
|
output_key: opportunity_2_content
|
||||||
|
hint: |
|
||||||
|
From the opportunity analysis above, extract the SECOND-BEST opportunity
|
||||||
|
(not the same as opportunity 1).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Write a complete market_intelligence task brief for it using the same format:
|
||||||
|
- What the opportunity is
|
||||||
|
- Why now
|
||||||
|
- What market data to find
|
||||||
|
- CL's potential entry angle
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If there is no distinct second opportunity worth researching, output exactly: none
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Output ONLY the brief text or the word none. No preamble.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: tool
|
||||||
|
action: enqueue_strategy
|
||||||
|
optional: true
|
||||||
|
params:
|
||||||
|
company_slug: "crimson_leaf"
|
||||||
|
project_slug: "incubation"
|
||||||
|
task_type: "market_intelligence"
|
||||||
|
content: "{opportunity_1_content}"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: tool
|
||||||
|
action: enqueue_strategy
|
||||||
|
optional: true
|
||||||
|
params:
|
||||||
|
company_slug: "crimson_leaf"
|
||||||
|
project_slug: "incubation"
|
||||||
|
task_type: "market_intelligence"
|
||||||
|
content: "{opportunity_2_content}"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- type: think
|
||||||
|
max_tokens: 100
|
||||||
|
output_key: dispatch_summary
|
||||||
|
hint: |
|
||||||
|
Count how many research tasks were commissioned this cycle.
|
||||||
|
Look at opportunity_1_content and opportunity_2_content above.
|
||||||
|
If both are not "none": output "Commissioned 2 research tasks."
|
||||||
|
If only opportunity_1_content is not "none": output "Commissioned 1 research task."
|
||||||
|
If both are "none": output "No research tasks commissioned -- no new opportunities found."
|
||||||
|
Output ONLY that sentence.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- type: reply
|
- type: reply
|
||||||
target: channel
|
target: channel
|
||||||
channel_name: "crimson_leaf:live-feed"
|
channel_name: "crimson_leaf:live-feed"
|
||||||
|
hint: |
|
||||||
|
Write a 3-5 line opportunity scan summary for Orion's report.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Start with: "Opportunity scan complete. {dispatch_summary}"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Then summarize:
|
||||||
|
- The top opportunity found (or "no new opportunities" if none)
|
||||||
|
- One key market signal with a citation if available
|
||||||
|
- One portfolio gap identified
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Be concise and action-oriented.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
adjudication:
|
adjudication:
|
||||||
enabled: false
|
enabled: false
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user