research: market analysis task={task.id}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
I appreciate the detailed charter and instructions, but I need to flag a critical issue:
|
||||
|
||||
**No task message was provided.**
|
||||
|
||||
The template you've shared expects a specific market opportunity in the "current message" section, but the operator's message is empty. I cannot produce a market analysis without knowing:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **What opportunity should I analyze?** (e.g., "AI-powered indie author web storefronts," "manuscript packaging for self-publishers," etc.)
|
||||
2. **What market segment or niche is in scope?**
|
||||
3. **Are there specific research passes (market_data_1 through market_data_5) already compiled that I should reference?**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What I'm Ready to Do
|
||||
|
||||
Once you provide:
|
||||
- **The specific opportunity name/description**, and
|
||||
- **The five research passes** (or confirmation that I should conduct them),
|
||||
|
||||
I will produce a **research-grade market analysis document** following the exact structure you've outlined, with:
|
||||
- Real citations only (no invented URLs)
|
||||
- Explicit assumptions for data gaps
|
||||
- Clear PROCEED / INVESTIGATE / PASS recommendation
|
||||
- Business plan flag
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Please resubmit with:**
|
||||
1. The market opportunity to analyze
|
||||
2. The research data passes (or authority to conduct them)
|
||||
|
||||
I'm standing by to execute this analysis to Crimson Leaf standards.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user