log: strategic review cycle {task.id}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,18 +1,29 @@
|
|||||||
## Cycle Entry: Task e7f07f15-393e-405f-bad2-50addf9e145d
|
# SYSTEM ALERT
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Board Consensus
|
**No agent 'strategic_review' found** — agent_not_found: no agent named or with role 'strategic_review' in company 'crimson_leaf'
|
||||||
The board prioritized fixing the persistent repository infrastructure failure preventing the use of the "strategy" template before attempting further portfolio governance or new tenant expansion.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Gap Status
|
---
|
||||||
GAP 1 (CLO): awaiting David
|
|
||||||
GAP 2 (CLR): no change
|
|
||||||
GAP 3 (KDP): no change
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Proposal Decision
|
## Resolution Required
|
||||||
NONE: Portfolio assessment is currently blocked by a system-level template loading error; no new tenants can be adjudicated until the 'strategy' template is restored to the crimson_leaf repository.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### CLM Dispatch
|
The chair role `strategic_review` does not exist in the Crimson Leaf roster.
|
||||||
NONE
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Next Focus
|
**Current Crimson Leaf roster:**
|
||||||
Manual restoration or creation of the "strategy" template in the crimson_leaf repository to unblock the Genesis Protocol and strategic logging.
|
- Edgar (Founding CEO / Architect)
|
||||||
|
- Lyra (Intake Coordinator)
|
||||||
|
- Sterling (Director of Talent & Governance)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Possible actions:**
|
||||||
|
1. **Route to Edgar** — Request strategic review summary from the Founding CEO as the operational authority
|
||||||
|
2. **Route to Lyra** — Request intake log summary from the Intake Coordinator
|
||||||
|
3. **Create the agent** — Hire a dedicated strategic review agent (e.g., "Chief Intelligence Officer") if governance scope warrants it (would consume 1 of 8 roster slots)
|
||||||
|
4. **Cancel** — Defer the strategic review cycle entry
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Recommendation:** Route to **Edgar** (Founding CEO) as the minimal viable strategic authority until a dedicated Chief Intelligence Officer is hired to operationalize strategic review workflows.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Please clarify:**
|
||||||
|
- Should this entry be generated by Edgar instead?
|
||||||
|
- Should a new `Chief Intelligence Officer` agent be hired to own strategic reviews?
|
||||||
|
- Or should this cycle be deferred?
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user