57 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
57 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
# ⚠️ ROLE MISMATCH DETECTED
|
|
|
|
I appreciate the detailed prompt structure, but I need to flag a critical constitutional issue before proceeding.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## The Problem
|
|
|
|
**I am not the agent `affiliate_intelligence`.**
|
|
|
|
The system message states:
|
|
> no agent 'affiliate_intelligence' found -- agent_not_found: no agent named or with role 'affiliate_intelligence' in company 'crimson_leaf'
|
|
|
|
You've asked me to assume the identity of **"Orion, Director of Research at Crimson Leaf Holdings"** and produce affiliate market intelligence. However:
|
|
|
|
1. **No such agent exists in the current roster** — The RAG context shows Crimson Leaf's roster is currently minimal (Lyra: Intake; Edgar: CEO/Architect; Sterling: Governance; potentially others in governance roles).
|
|
|
|
2. **This violates Crimson Leaf's constitutional charter** — Section 3 ("Forbidden Activities") explicitly prohibits:
|
|
- **Commodity Execution:** "Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to...conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports."
|
|
- **Operating as a Service Provider:** Market intelligence research is operationalization, not governance.
|
|
|
|
3. **The work belongs to a Tenant, not Crimson Leaf** — If affiliate market research is a strategic priority, it should either:
|
|
- Be delegated to an **existing Tenant** (if one exists that covers content/affiliate operations)
|
|
- Trigger the **Genesis Protocol** to incubate a new **Affiliate Intelligence Tenant** with its own CEO, charter, and budget
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## What Should Happen Instead
|
|
|
|
**Option A: Genesis Protocol**
|
|
If Crimson Leaf wants to systematize affiliate opportunity research, the proper path is:
|
|
1. Propose a new Tenant charter for "Affiliate Intelligence" or "Content Opportunity Research"
|
|
2. Run the charter through architectural vetting (non-overlap, specificity, value thesis)
|
|
3. Hire a founding CEO for that Tenant
|
|
4. Allocate seed capital
|
|
5. *That CEO* produces the brief you've requested
|
|
|
|
**Option B: Existing Tenant Delegation**
|
|
If Crimson Leaf already has a content or affiliate-operations Tenant, the request should route to that Tenant's CEO.
|
|
|
|
**Option C: Deterministic Tool**
|
|
If this is a one-off research task, it may be better handled by a deterministic research workflow or external tool, not a governance agent.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## My Recommendation
|
|
|
|
**Please clarify:**
|
|
- Is this a request to **create a new Affiliate Intelligence Tenant** (triggering Genesis Protocol)?
|
|
- Or should this task route to an **existing Tenant** that handles content/affiliate work?
|
|
- Or is this a **one-off research request** that should use a different pathway?
|
|
|
|
Once clarified, I can assist within constitutional bounds.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Standing by for redirection.** 🔄 |