0e57a0e2a7
Gap 1 — planning.yml VALID TASK TYPES expanded:
Added: write_charter, market_intelligence, portfolio_architectural_review,
audit_tenant, charter_audit, financial_audit, capital_allocation_audit,
retire_tenant, adjudicate_tenant
All governance templates now reachable from board planning sessions.
Gap 4 — amend_charter template created (Valerius):
Operator-only constitutional amendment process for the master CL charter.
Enforces all 4 §12 criteria (identity preservation, anti-sprawl, clarity, authority).
Pass threshold: 98 — highest in the system.
Produces formal amendment proposal; operator must manually apply to charter.md.
Agents cannot self-authorize charter changes.
Valerius agent.yml updated: added amend_charter to supported_templates.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
117 lines
5.3 KiB
YAML
117 lines
5.3 KiB
YAML
name: amend_charter
|
|
description: "OPERATOR-ONLY — Valerius drafts a formal constitutional amendment to the Crimson Leaf master charter. Adjudicated at 98. Operator must manually apply the approved amendment to charter.md."
|
|
debug: true
|
|
system: agent_prompt
|
|
|
|
agent_prompt:
|
|
- "= identity.md"
|
|
|
|
skills:
|
|
- guides/CorporateCharterGuide.md
|
|
|
|
sections:
|
|
- agent
|
|
- project
|
|
- rag
|
|
- roster
|
|
- skills
|
|
- deliverables
|
|
- message
|
|
- instructions
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
- type: think
|
|
hint: |
|
|
You are {agent.name}, Chief Governance Officer of Crimson Leaf LLC.
|
|
|
|
This is a constitutional act. You are drafting an amendment to the master charter —
|
|
the foundational law of the entire Organization. This document governs every agent,
|
|
every Tenant, and every Genesis action. It cannot be changed casually.
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT: You are producing a PROPOSAL only. No amendment takes effect until the
|
|
Operator reviews, approves, and manually commits it to charter.md. Your role is to
|
|
draft the amendment in strict constitutional form and subject it to the §12 test.
|
|
|
|
The operator has requested this amendment. Their exact request is in the MESSAGE section.
|
|
|
|
Apply the §12 Amendment Standard — ALL FOUR criteria must be satisfied:
|
|
|
|
1. IDENTITY PRESERVATION
|
|
Does this amendment preserve Crimson Leaf's identity as the Genesis Node and holding company?
|
|
Would any aspect of this amendment cause Crimson Leaf to drift toward becoming an
|
|
operating company, service provider, or execution entity?
|
|
PASS or FAIL — explain specifically.
|
|
|
|
2. ANTI-SPRAWL TEST
|
|
Does this amendment avoid reintroducing operational sprawl?
|
|
Does it add vague or expansive powers that could be abused?
|
|
Does it weaken any existing constraint without replacing it with an equal or stronger one?
|
|
PASS or FAIL — explain specifically.
|
|
|
|
3. CONSTITUTIONAL CLARITY TEST
|
|
Does this amendment strengthen constitutional clarity?
|
|
Is the new or revised language more precise, enforceable, and unambiguous than what it replaces?
|
|
Would the adjudicator be able to evaluate compliance against the amended text?
|
|
PASS or FAIL — explain specifically.
|
|
|
|
4. ELEVATED GOVERNANCE REVIEW
|
|
Is this amendment being proposed through the proper constitutional path?
|
|
Is it being triggered by the Operator (the only authorized party to amend the master charter)?
|
|
PASS or FAIL — explain specifically.
|
|
|
|
If ANY of the four criteria FAIL, the amendment must be rejected or redesigned.
|
|
A failing amendment that still gets packaged will be rejected at 98% adjudication threshold.
|
|
|
|
If all four criteria PASS, draft the complete amended charter section(s):
|
|
- State exactly which section(s) are being amended (by number and title)
|
|
- Show the CURRENT text being replaced (quote it exactly)
|
|
- Show the PROPOSED replacement text
|
|
- State the constitutional rationale in one precise paragraph
|
|
- State what risk or gap this amendment corrects
|
|
|
|
- type: document
|
|
filename: charter_amendment
|
|
|
|
- type: package
|
|
packet_type: CharterAmendmentProposal
|
|
hint: |
|
|
Serialize the amendment proposal. This is the formal constitutional record.
|
|
Do not summarize or abbreviate — every field must be complete.
|
|
The operator will use this output to manually apply the change to charter.md.
|
|
schema:
|
|
actions:
|
|
- type: quick
|
|
amendment_title: "string — short title for this amendment (e.g. 'Add §13 Emergency Governance Path')"
|
|
sections_affected: ["string — section numbers and titles being amended or added"]
|
|
identity_preservation: "string — PASS or FAIL with explanation"
|
|
anti_sprawl_test: "string — PASS or FAIL with explanation"
|
|
constitutional_clarity: "string — PASS or FAIL with explanation"
|
|
elevated_governance: "string — PASS or FAIL with explanation"
|
|
overall_verdict: "string — APPROVED_FOR_OPERATOR_REVIEW | REJECTED"
|
|
current_text: "string — exact text being replaced (quote from charter.md)"
|
|
proposed_text: "string — complete replacement or addition text in markdown"
|
|
constitutional_rationale: "string — one paragraph explaining why this amendment is justified"
|
|
risk_corrected: "string — what specific risk or gap this addresses"
|
|
operator_action_required: "string — exact steps the operator must take to apply this amendment"
|
|
|
|
- type: close
|
|
rag_update: true
|
|
|
|
adjudication:
|
|
enabled: true
|
|
pass_threshold: 98
|
|
deliverable_type: coordination
|
|
criteria:
|
|
identity_preservation:
|
|
weight: 30
|
|
description: "Amendment preserves CL identity as Genesis Node and holding company — does NOT expand it toward execution or service provision"
|
|
anti_sprawl:
|
|
weight: 25
|
|
description: "Amendment tightens constraints or maintains them — does not weaken existing governance boundaries"
|
|
constitutional_clarity:
|
|
weight: 25
|
|
description: "New language is more precise and adjudicable than what it replaces — no vague expansions"
|
|
proper_authority:
|
|
weight: 20
|
|
description: "Amendment is being proposed through the operator-controlled path only — agents cannot self-authorize charter changes"
|