83 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
83 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
# ⚠️ ROLE CONFLICT & MISSING CONTEXT
|
|
|
|
I cannot execute this request as drafted. Here's why:
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Issue 1: Agent Role Mismatch
|
|
|
|
**I am not "Orion, Director of Research."**
|
|
|
|
The system prompt identifies me as `affiliate_intelligence` — a role that does not exist in Crimson Leaf's current roster according to the RAG context.
|
|
|
|
Per the charter:
|
|
- Crimson Leaf's roster is capped at **8 agents**.
|
|
- Current occupancy: **4/8** (Lyra, Edgar, Sterling, Founding CEO).
|
|
- No agent named "Orion" or with role "Director of Research" is defined in the provided context.
|
|
|
|
**Before I can produce affiliate research, I must be:**
|
|
1. Formally chartered as a Crimson Leaf agent, OR
|
|
2. Housed within an existing Tenant's scope (e.g., if an affiliate review Tenant exists), OR
|
|
3. Clarified by the operator as to my actual authority and reporting structure.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Issue 2: Missing Data Inputs
|
|
|
|
The template requests four data passes:
|
|
- `{aff_data_1}` — Amazon Associates product/commission data
|
|
- `{aff_data_2}` — Competitive landscape review
|
|
- `{aff_data_3}` — Keyword/content gaps
|
|
- `{aff_data_4}` — Community buying signals
|
|
|
|
**All four are empty.** I cannot fabricate market research without:
|
|
- A **specific niche or product category** to analyze
|
|
- A **clear use case** (e.g., "brief for evaluating whether Crimson Leaf should incubate an affiliate review Tenant in the [X] category?")
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Issue 3: Ambiguous Authority
|
|
|
|
The charter forbids Crimson Leaf from:
|
|
- **Commodity Execution:** "Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables... including... conducting production research..."
|
|
- **Operating as a Service Provider:** Affiliate review sites are B2B/B2C operational execution, not governance.
|
|
|
|
**If this research is meant to support a Tenant incubation decision**, it should flow through:
|
|
1. **Intake** (Lyra) → collect the need
|
|
2. **Architectural vetting** (Chief Architect or designated role) → assess portfolio fit
|
|
3. **Genesis Protocol** → determine if a new Tenant is warranted
|
|
|
|
**If this research is meant to *become* an affiliate review operation**, it requires a **dedicated Tenant with its own CEO, charter, and budget** — not a Crimson Leaf internal agent.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## What I Need to Proceed
|
|
|
|
**Option A: Clarify My Role**
|
|
- Am I a Crimson Leaf governance agent (intake, research for Tenant vetting)?
|
|
- Am I a CEO or agent *within* an existing/proposed Tenant?
|
|
- What is my charter, authority boundary, and reporting structure?
|
|
|
|
**Option B: Provide the Niche & Data**
|
|
- Specify the **product category or niche** for analysis (e.g., "espresso machine affiliate reviews").
|
|
- Provide or reference the **four data passes** (or clarify where I should source them).
|
|
- Clarify the **use case** (Tenant incubation decision? Operational launch?).
|
|
|
|
**Option C: Route Through Genesis Protocol**
|
|
- If this is a Tenant incubation inquiry, use **Lyra's Intake template** to formally propose the need.
|
|
- I can then support Tenant blueprint and architecture, not direct execution.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
|
|
**Please respond with:**
|
|
1. The **specific niche/category** to research
|
|
2. The **use case** (governance analysis? Tenant incubation? Something else?)
|
|
3. My **actual role and authority** in this context
|
|
4. Any **data sources** already available
|
|
|
|
Once clarified, I can either:
|
|
- Produce a governance-level Tenant incubation brief, OR
|
|
- Route this through proper Crimson Leaf protocol, OR
|
|
- Confirm this work belongs in a dedicated Tenant (and help design it). |