31 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
31 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
I need to clarify the situation before writing a cycle entry.
|
||
|
||
**BLOCKER: No active strategic_review agent found.**
|
||
|
||
The system indicates:
|
||
- Chair requested: `strategic_review`
|
||
- Agent status: `no agent named or with role 'strategic_review' in company 'crimson_leaf'`
|
||
|
||
**Current Crimson Leaf roster** (per RAG context):
|
||
- Edgar (Founding CEO/Vision)
|
||
- Lyra (Intake Coordinator)
|
||
- Sterling (Talent/Governance)
|
||
- Possibly others per 8-agent model, but none explicitly labeled `strategic_review`
|
||
|
||
**What I observe from the portfolio report:**
|
||
- Incubation project: 9 tasks in progress, 1,194 completed, last activity 0 hours ago
|
||
- No agent named `strategic_review` exists to convene or summarize board consensus
|
||
|
||
**Options:**
|
||
|
||
1. **Create the missing agent** – I can draft a `strategic_review` agent charter and submit for incubation if this role is missing from Crimson Leaf's executive board.
|
||
|
||
2. **Escalate to Edgar** – The Founding CEO should clarify whether strategic_review should exist or if a different chair should be used.
|
||
|
||
3. **Use an existing agent** – Should Lyra (Intake), Sterling (Governance), or Edgar (CEO) synthesize this cycle's log entry instead?
|
||
|
||
**Which would you prefer?**
|
||
|
||
If you want me to proceed with writing the cycle entry, please confirm:
|
||
- Who should author this entry (Edgar, Lyra, Sterling, or a new `strategic_review` role)?
|
||
- What decisions or proposals were actually made this cycle that should be logged? |