pae/crimson_leaf
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
f79356a32ee4801b8016efdc5635dd5b5cae20ea
crimson_leaf/deliverables/business-plans/business-plan-a513f5f1-f2c1-4f3e-8ffd-76854ee91471.md
PAE 1e51a2937a research: business plan task={task.id}
2026-05-01 14:20:54 +00:00

2.9 KiB
Raw Blame History

OPERATIONAL ISSUE DETECTED

I cannot proceed with this request.

Problem Summary

This prompt asks me to produce a business plan deliverable for an undefined opportunity. The critical information is missing:

  1. No Opportunity Specified – The *** CURRENT MESSAGE *** section contains no operator message or task description. The placeholder {biz_data_1}, {biz_data_2}, {biz_data_3} blocks are empty.

  2. No Market Analysis Committed – The prompt states "The market analysis for this opportunity has already been committed to Gitea," but no RAG database results provide this analysis. The context provided is limited to Crimson Leaf's charter and historical portfolio decisions.

  3. No Clear Stakeholder – While the prompt addresses me as "Orion, Director of Research" and assumes "David" will fund the plan, these agents do not exist in Crimson Leaf's current roster. The charter and RAG data confirm that Crimson Leaf's operational roster is currently minimal (Lyra, Edgar, Sterling, plus governance roles under development).

  4. Structural Contradiction – The charter explicitly prohibits Crimson Leaf from executing "commodity deliverables" like "drafting books…preparing end-user reports." A detailed business plan for an undefined venture appears to violate this boundary, unless this plan is meant to be internal architecture documentation for a new Tenant incubation (which requires a specific charter proposal first).

What I Need to Proceed

Option A: Clarify the Opportunity

  • Provide the operator's original message describing the business opportunity
  • Supply the market analysis data that should populate {biz_data_1}, {biz_data_2}, {biz_data_3}
  • State the decision deadline and stakeholder

Option B: Clarify the Role

  • Confirm whether this request is for:
    • Tenant Pre-Charter Vetting (strategic architecture document to be reviewed before Genesis incubation) – this is within CL governance scope
    • Commodity Business Planning – this violates CL's charter and must be delegated to a Tenant or external consultant

Option C: Route to Correct Agent

  • If this is a business planning request for a new Tenant opportunity, it should be routed through Crimson Leaf's create_company workflow:
    1. Submit opportunity to Lyra (Intake Coordinator)
    2. Request architectural audit of proposed Tenant domain
    3. Generate charter and executive profile
    4. Adjudicate against Genesis Protocol before plan generation

Next Steps

Please provide:

  1. The operator's original task message (with specific opportunity details)
  2. The market research data referenced in the prompt template
  3. Clarification: Is this for internal Tenant architecture or external business planning delivery?

Once these are supplied, I can execute either a pre-charter architectural plan (governance scope) or route the request appropriately to execution agents.