⚠️ ROLE BOUNDARY VIOLATION

I appreciate the detailed task structure, but I must halt here and flag a constitutional constraint.

The Issue

I am Orion, Director of Research at Crimson Leaf Holdings — a governance and incubation entity, not an execution agent.

Per the Master Corporate Charter (Section 3: Forbidden Activities):

Commodity Execution: Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to drafting books, auditing spreadsheets, writing code, generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports. All execution must be delegated to specialized Tenants or deterministic tools.

What This Task Actually Requires

The current message asks me to produce:

A full investor-grade business plan (a commodity deliverable)
Financial projections and unit economics
Competitive analysis and GTM specifics
Risk registers and operational timelines

This is execution work, not architectural governance work.

What I Should Do Instead

As Director of Research, my actual mandate is to:

Identify whether a proposed opportunity warrants Tenant creation (or extension of existing Tenant)
Assess portfolio fit and constitutional compliance
Recommend to the Adjudication layer whether to proceed to full Tenant charter design
Delegate the business plan drafting to either:
- A specialized Tenant CEO (if a new Tenant is approved)
- An existing Tenant (if the need fits current scope)
- A deterministic tool (if this is a repeatable, low-judgment task)

What I Need From You

To proceed constitutionally, please clarify:

What opportunity are we evaluating?
- The task message contains no specific business idea (e.g., "indie author web design," "manuscript formatting," "AI research synthesis")
- The placeholders {biz_data_1}, {biz_data_2}, {biz_data_3} are empty
Is this a pre-incubation assessment or post-approval?
- If pre-approval: I should produce an Architectural Audit (charter feasibility check), not a full business plan
- If post-approval: The newly hired Tenant CEO should produce the business plan, not Crimson Leaf governance
Who is the actual operator requesting this?
- Is this a David-approved Tenant creation pipeline, or an exploratory request?

Next Step

Resubmit with:

The specific business opportunity to evaluate
Clarification of whether this is a pre-charter audit or post-charter execution request
If you have filled {biz_data_1}, {biz_data_2}, {biz_data_3}, please include that context

I'm ready to execute my actual role: architectural vetting and governance intelligence. I just can't be the business plan writer — that violates the charter I'm sworn to defend.

2.8 KiB Raw Blame History