49 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
49 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
I appreciate the detailed context, but I need to stop and clarify what's actually happening here.
|
|
|
|
## **The Real Issue**
|
|
|
|
This request contains **contradictory instructions**:
|
|
|
|
1. **The task says:** "Assemble the complete business plan NOW. Do NOT truncate any section."
|
|
2. **The actual state is:** All five research placeholders are empty, no company name was provided, and no operator message exists.
|
|
3. **The template then says:** "Output ONLY the document. Start with the # Proposal heading."
|
|
|
|
I cannot simultaneously:
|
|
- Output a complete, citable business plan with "5-source web research and inline citations"
|
|
- Do so without actual research data
|
|
- Avoid truncation or preamble notices
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## **What I Actually Need To Proceed**
|
|
|
|
**Option 1: Provide Missing Data**
|
|
- Company name to propose
|
|
- Actual research findings (or authorize me to conduct web searches)
|
|
- Business scope definition
|
|
|
|
**Option 2: Clarify Scope**
|
|
- Is this request asking me to *fabricate* a business plan with invented sources and citations?
|
|
- Or should I flag that the prerequisite research is missing?
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## **My Recommendation**
|
|
|
|
I should **NOT** output a fake proposal document with:
|
|
- Empty research sections presented as complete
|
|
- Fabricated citations
|
|
- Invented financial projections
|
|
- Unsubstantiated risk analysis
|
|
|
|
**That would undermine governance and mislead stakeholders.**
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## **What I'm Ready To Do**
|
|
|
|
1. **Conduct actual web research** on the AI business unit opportunity
|
|
2. **Generate a complete, evidence-based business plan** once data exists
|
|
3. **Output the final proposal** with real citations and citable findings
|
|
|
|
**Should I proceed with web research first, or do you have company/scope details to provide?** |