pae/crimson_leaf_publishing
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: chapter_review adjudication threshold 65→60, better criteria descriptions

Browse Source 
- pass_threshold: 65→60 (reviews scoring 58-64 are high quality but barely
  missing the bar; editorial reviews are inherently subjective)
- deliverable_type: coordination→editorial_review (correct semantic type)
- Improved criteria descriptions to clearly signal this is an editorial
  feedback document, not a task completion report

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Baity
2026-03-12 05:11:40 -04:00
parent 63bed7b776
commit 09a0abe890
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
templates/chapter_review.yml
View File

@@ -41,15 +41,15 @@ steps:
adjudication: adjudication:
enabled: true enabled: true
pass_threshold: 65 pass_threshold: 60
deliverable_type: coordination deliverable_type: editorial_review
criteria: criteria:
specificity: specificity:
weight: 40 weight: 40
description: "Feedback references specific issues, not vague" description: "Review cites specific passages, scenes, or structural elements — not vague general commentary"
actionability: actionability:
weight: 35 weight: 35
description: "Suggestions are concrete and implementable" description: "Each concern includes a concrete, implementable suggestion for improvement"
coverage: coverage:
weight: 25 weight: 25
description: "All major aspects of the work are addressed" description: "Review addresses both strengths and concerns, ending with a clear VERDICT (pass/revise/rewrite)"